
- Brandeis Library
- Research Guides

Doing a Literature Review in Sociology
Introduction, early in the process, during data analysis, getting ready to write, before submitting the paper.
- Searching: Early in the Process
- Organizing: Getting Ready to Write
Top Journals & Publishers
Recommended Journals
- American Journal of Sociology Published by University of Chicago Press, available through JSTOR
- American Sociological Review Published by the American Sociological Association, available through SAGE Journals database
- Annual Review of Sociology Published by Annual Reviews, available through Brandeis subscription to the Annual Reviews website
- Social Forces Published by Oxford University Press, most recent issues (2000-present) available through Project Muse database
- Social Problems Published by Oxford University Press, available through Brandeis subscription to Oxford University Press website
- Theory & Society Published by Springer, available through Brandeis's subscription to Springer Standard Collection
Recommended Publishers
Found a good book that we don't own? Contact [email protected] to request a library purchase!
A literature review helps you figure out what scholars, what studies, and what questions your project is in conversation with. It typically happens in stages throughout the life of your project – it is not something you do once and are then finished with!
This guide explores how to think about and do a literature review at four different stages of a project. On this page, Professor Wendy Cadge suggests how to think about each step. Get specific advice on strategies for searching and organizing on the subsequent pages of this guide.
Wendy's Process
The first time I do a literature review is when I am thinking about possible research topics and questions and want to know what people have written about these questions and what they have found. I search the topics and questions broadly aiming to get a relatively comprehensive sense of what is known about my topic and whether there is space for another study that is going to contribute meaningfully to the conversation. I am trying to figure out both who is in this conversation (what scholars specifically but also in what fields), what they are talking about, and what is known and not known according to these experts.
The goal here is to figure out whether my study will be new and relevant and whether there is a way to motivate it both empirically and theoretically for the audience I am thinking of. I need this answer to be yes in order to proceed with the process.
As I do this initial literature review I am also refining my research question, asking myself whether it makes sense, how it relates to the ways others have approached my topic, etc. Often questions are too big (they will require thousands of pages to answer) or too small (you don’t need an empirical study to answer them) so I am also trying to get my question to be the right size as I do this first review.
My search strategies are as follows Google Scholar and Sociological Abstracts with key terms, and focus on books published by major presses and articles in well-known journals. When I get hits I sort them into groups based on what they are - materials by sociologists, by other academics, by journalists, etc. I only read things that are published (no conference papers!) and read books in the top academic presses first (Chicago, UC Berkeley, Princeton, Oxford, Cambridge) and things in well-known sociology journals. (See the box to the left for links to these journals.) Depending on the topic, I may read a lot written by non-sociologists to learn more . I read almost nothing in the popular media on the first go through.
I also don’t “read” everything - I skim books and read article abstracts to get an overview. The goal is to write 5-6 double spaced pages about what is known and what my study might add. I also want to have a set of more specific search terms and author names to search later. Typically I am mostly reviewing the sociology literature to think about how to fit this into a social science frame while also separating out “primary sources” to read later. These other sources about my topic include data (like government reports, statistical information etc.), which will be analyzed later rather than used for sociological framing.
Before I start collecting data I check with various colleagues to make sure my assessment of the literature and the place of my study in it (my 5-6 page document) makes sense and is convincing (i.e., I don’t want to waste my time gathering data to answer a question that people either don’t think is interesting, has already been answered in the literature, or isn’t going to add anything new and significant to the conversation. I don’t want to be the dud at the dinner party who is saying something people already know or doesn’t have anything to say.
Themes typically emerge in the process of analyzing the data that require me to revisit what I think I know about my topic and question from the literature. This is usually the place where I am trying to figure out what my empirical and theoretical arguments are. Often I have ideas about what my theoretical hooks or arguments might be but they come from other literatures, scholars or friends working in different parts of sociology, etc. This is often where I go back to the literature (via Annual Review articles and searches) to see how people have used certain concepts and to see if those concepts might help me articulate what I am finding. I also read the key empirical articles cited in the Annual Review articles to see how what I am finding is similar to and different from what others know and how I can relate to those studies with my data.
Search strategies Google scholar and Sociological Abstracts, Annual review articles, asking people who know the discipline better than I do where to go to learn about concept x or y. At this point I’m looking for ideas as I read that will help me make and articulate whatever arguments might be supported by my data.
By the time I finish this step I have a good sense of what my findings and argument are and how they fit i nto the existing conversation / literature.
If I have done the above two steps well, I probably have an outline by now that lays out what I think my findings are and how I am going to situate them and motivate them in existing literatures. Before I start to write I read through my entire Endnote database and I put citations and notes in the outline that will help me make certain points. If I see holes or don’t feel like the outline is tight enough I do more lit review at this point to help me situate my question as tightly as possible in existing literature. While articles are written in a way that makes it look like you do the lit review, then the data collection and analysis, then articulate the findings, etc. this is actually iterative for me through the whole process.
For more information on EndNote and other citation management software like Zotero, see the Organizing section of this guide .
Search strategies The same as what’s outlined above. Part of the trick here though is knowing when to stop searching and start writing! I try to start writing before I feel like I am finished reading because I will discover as I write what is missing and will go back and fill it in.
I have friends and colleagues read my paper and give me feedback. If this is going to a journal I look at the editorial board and make sure I have engaged with the ideas of any scholars on the editorial board that are relevant as these people are likely to be reviewers . I also always fill in a lot of citations after the article is drafted so I can see it as a whole and see what is and is not needed to make the argument more compelling.
Search strategies This is when I am looking up certain people usually on the web to see if I read relevant publications or am searching for a particular article. If I know I need some citations about a certain topic to support a point, this is also when I find them. This is usually the easiest part of the process.
- Next: Searching: Early in the Process >>
- Last Updated: Dec 22, 2022 1:03 PM
- URL: https://guides.library.brandeis.edu/soclitreviews
Fact check: Correcting the record about the UC Berkeley Library’s long-term space plan
Secondary menu
- Log in to your Library account
- Hours and Maps
- Connect from Off Campus
- UC Berkeley Home
Search form
Sociology: lit reviews.
- Quick start
- Get Articles
- Lit Reviews
- Sociology 127: Development and Globalization
- Sociology of Emotions (Soc 190)
Literature Review
In a literature review you explore research that has come before you and is relevant to your topic. It can help you identify:
- Core research in the field
- Experts in the subject area
- Methodology you may want to use (or avoid)
- Gaps in the literature -- or where your research would fit in
Helpful approaches:
- See what literature reviews already exist on your topic! Databases like Oxford Bibliographies Online: Sociology and Sociological Abstracts (limit the document type to literature review) can save you a lot of time. Also don’t forget the Annual Review of Sociology , and the Proquest Dissertations and Theses database; these in-depth pieces usually have comprehensive lists of references.
- Citation slogging (aka "snowballing") -- work your way back through citations (or footnotes) to key articles
- Forward citation -- see who has cited key articles using Google Scholar and Web of Science Cited Reference Search .
Writing Guidelines:
- Start with Writing for Sociology from the UC Berkeley Sociology Department—it’s packed with great content!
- A great overview of the entire process from the Writing Center at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
- A piece from the blog Everyday Sociology on “ How (and Why) to Write a Literature Review ”
Systematic Reviews
Systematic reviews are not the same as literature reviews; instead, they can be considered an extremely rigorous subset of literature reviews. Generally, systematic reviews take a team of professionals and one to two years to complete, and they usually can't be done for avenues of research which are newly being explored (there needs to be an established body of literature to examine). This makes them very helpful resources if they exist for your topic of interest!
You may wish to peruse UCSF's Systematic Review Guide for information.
If you do decide to do a systematic review, UC Berkeley licenses Covidence , a tool to help you. In Covidence, you can import citations , screen titles and abstracts , upload references , screen full text , create forms for critical appraisal , perform risk of bias tables , complete data extraction , and export a PRISMA flowchart summarizing your review process. As an institutional member, our users have priority access to Covidence support. To access Covidence using the UC Berkeley institutional account , start at this page and follow the instructions.
Great brief overview, from NCSU
Synthesizing the literature
Now That You Have All Those Articles, How Do You Synthesize Them?
Unlike the annotated bibliography, the literature review does not just summarize each article or book. Instead, they synthesize. Some researchers find it helpful to develop a framework, making a column for each element that they want to compare. The elements vary depending on the research, making it easier to understand the relationships between all the articles and how they relate to your research. Here's one example !
How To Organize and Cite Your Research
Citation management tools help you manage your research, collect and cite sources, and create bibliographies in a variety of citation styles. Each one has its strengths and weaknesses, but any are easier than doing it by hand! The Library offers workshops on Endnote, Zotero, and Refworks. I'm also happy to help arrange a small group workshop, or one on one help with Zotero.
For more information on the various tools available, and more on Zotero, see the "Managing Citations" tab in this guide!
Find Dissertations
Dissertations and Theses (Dissertation Abstracts) Full Text : indexes dissertations from over 1,000 North American, and selected European, graduate schools and universities from 1861 to the present. Full text for most of the dissertations added since 1997.
UC Berkeley dissertations : Search UC Library Search by author. Also helpful to see dissertations written in your department which you can do by doing a subject search:
- subject: university of california berkeley dept of psychology dissertations
- subject: dissertations academic ucb psychology
Recent UC Berkeley dissertations are freely available online to anyone, anywhere with access to the internet. Also see Find Dissertations and Theses for other specialized sources.
- << Previous: Data
- Next: Citations >>
- Last Updated: Dec 8, 2022 9:23 AM
- URL: https://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/soc
University Library
- Research Guides
- Literature Reviews
- Books, Encyclopedias, & Media
- Articles & Databases
- Methods/Stats/Datasets
- Annotated Bibliographies
- Presentations
- APA 6th Edition
- Majors, Minors, and Careers in Sociology
What is a Literature Review?
The scholarly conversation.
A literature review provides an overview of previous research on a topic that critically evaluates, classifies, and compares what has already been published on a particular topic. It allows the author to synthesize and place into context the research and scholarly literature relevant to the topic. It helps map the different approaches to a given question and reveals patterns. It forms the foundation for the author’s subsequent research and justifies the significance of the new investigation.
A literature review can be a short introductory section of a research article or a report or policy paper that focuses on recent research. Or, in the case of dissertations, theses, and review articles, it can be an extensive review of all relevant research.
- The format is usually a bibliographic essay; sources are briefly cited within the body of the essay, with full bibliographic citations at the end.
- The introduction should define the topic and set the context for the literature review. It will include the author's perspective or point of view on the topic, how they have defined the scope of the topic (including what's not included), and how the review will be organized. It can point out overall trends, conflicts in methodology or conclusions, and gaps in the research.
- In the body of the review, the author should organize the research into major topics and subtopics. These groupings may be by subject, (e.g., globalization of clothing manufacturing), type of research (e.g., case studies), methodology (e.g., qualitative), genre, chronology, or other common characteristics. Within these groups, the author can then discuss the merits of each article and analyze and compare the importance of each article to similar ones.
- The conclusion will summarize the main findings, make clear how this review of the literature supports (or not) the research to follow, and may point the direction for further research.
- The list of references will include full citations for all of the items mentioned in the literature review.
Key Questions for a Literature Review
A literature review should try to answer questions such as
- Who are the key researchers on this topic?
- What has been the focus of the research efforts so far and what is the current status?
- How have certain studies built on prior studies? Where are the connections? Are there new interpretations of the research?
- Have there been any controversies or debate about the research? Is there consensus? Are there any contradictions?
- Which areas have been identified as needing further research? Have any pathways been suggested?
- How will your topic uniquely contribute to this body of knowledge?
- Which methodologies have researchers used and which appear to be the most productive?
- What sources of information or data were identified that might be useful to you?
- How does your particular topic fit into the larger context of what has already been done?
- How has the research that has already been done help frame your current investigation ?
Examples of Literature Reviews
Example of a literature review at the beginning of an article: Forbes, C. C., Blanchard, C. M., Mummery, W. K., & Courneya, K. S. (2015, March). Prevalence and correlates of strength exercise among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors . Oncology Nursing Forum, 42(2), 118+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.sonoma.idm.oclc.org/ps/i.do?p=HRCA&sw=w&u=sonomacsu&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA422059606&asid=27e45873fddc413ac1bebbc129f7649c Example of a comprehensive review of the literature: Wilson, J. L. (2016). An exploration of bullying behaviours in nursing: a review of the literature. British Journal Of Nursing , 25 (6), 303-306. For additional examples, see:
Galvan, J., Galvan, M., & ProQuest. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (Seventh ed.). [Electronic book]
Pan, M., & Lopez, M. (2008). Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Pub. [ Q180.55.E9 P36 2008]
Useful Links
- Write a Literature Review (UCSC)
- Literature Reviews (Purdue)
- Literature Reviews: overview (UNC)
- Review of Literature (UW-Madison)
Evidence Matrix for Literature Reviews
The Evidence Matrix can help you organize your research before writing your lit review. Use it to identify patterns and commonalities in the articles you have found--similar methodologies ? common theoretical frameworks ? It helps you make sure that all your major concepts covered. It also helps you see how your research fits into the context of the overall topic.
- Evidence Matrix Special thanks to Dr. Cindy Stearns, SSU Sociology Dept, for permission to use this Matrix as an example.
- << Previous: Methods/Stats/Datasets
- Next: Annotated Bibliographies >>
- Last Updated: Aug 30, 2022 11:38 AM
- URL: https://libguides.sonoma.edu/sociology
- Reserve a study room
- Library Account
- Undergraduate Students
- Graduate Students
- Faculty & Staff
- VCU Libraries
- Research Guides
- Literature Reviews
- Scholarly Articles
- Books | Videos | More
- Data Sources
- Digital Sociology
What is a Literature Review?
A literature review is an essential component of every research project. It requires “re-viewing” what credible scholars in the field have said, done, and found in order to help you:
- Identify what is currently known in your area of interest
- Establish an empirical/ theoretical/ foundation for your research
- Identify potential gaps in knowledge that you might fill
- Develop viable research questions and hypotheses
- Determine appropriate methodologies
- Decide upon the scope of your research
- Demonstrate the importance of your research to the field
- VCU Libraries Guide: How to Write a Literature Review
Helpful Tools for Literature Reviews
- Basic Search Guide Tips for planning a search strategy
- Academic Phrasebank Examples of common phrases used in literature reviews and reports of research findings. The items in the Academic Phrasebank are mostly content neutral and generic in nature; in using them, therefore, you are not stealing other people’s ideas and this does not constitute plagiarism.
As you read, you'll encounter various ideas, disagreements, methods, and perspectives which can be hard to organize in a meaningful way. Because you'll be reading a number of resources, a synthesis matrix helps you record the main points of each source and document how sources relate to each other.
- Writing a Literature Review & Using a Synthesis Matrix
- Excel Matrix Customize columns to fit your needs
- << Previous: Data Sources
- Next: Digital Sociology >>
- Last Updated: Feb 9, 2023 3:05 PM
- URL: https://guides.library.vcu.edu/sociology
Sociology Research Guide
- Picking a topic
- Background research and finding books
- Advanced searching in databases and Google
- Finding statistics
- Evaluating sources
- Literature Reviews
What is a Lit Review?
How to write a lit review.
- Video Introduction to Lit Reviews
Main Objectives
Examples of lit reviews, additional resources.
- SOC1: Morales (Cultural Artifact)
- SOC4: Ie (Literature Review)
What is a literature review?
- Either a complete piece of writing unto itself or a section of a larger piece of writing like a book or article
- A thorough and critical look at the information and perspectives that other experts and scholars have written about a specific topic
- A way to give historical perspective on an issue and show how other researchers have addressed a problem
- An analysis of sources based on your own perspective on the topic
- Based on the most pertinent and significant research conducted in the field, both new and old

- A descriptive list or collection of summaries of other research without synthesis or analysis
- An annotated bibliography
- A literary review (a brief, critical discussion about the merits and weaknesses of a literary work such as a play, novel or a book of poems)
- Exhaustive; the objective is not to list as many relevant books, articles, reports as possible
- To convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic
- To explain what the strengths and weaknesses of that knowledge and those ideas might be
- To learn how others have defined and measured key concepts
- To keep the writer/reader up to date with current developments and historical trends in a particular field or discipline
- To establish context for the argument explored in the rest of a paper
- To provide evidence that may be used to support your own findings
- To demonstrate your understanding and your ability to critically evaluate research in the field
- To suggest previously unused or underused methodologies, designs, and quantitative and qualitative strategies
- To identify gaps in previous studies and flawed methodologies and/or theoretical approaches in order to avoid replication of mistakes
- To help the researcher avoid repetition of earlier research
- To suggest unexplored populations
- To determine whether past studies agree or disagree and identify strengths and weaknesses on both sides of a controversy in the literature

- Choose a topic that is interesting to you; this makes the research and writing process more enjoyable and rewarding.
- For a literature review, you'll also want to make sure that the topic you choose is one that other researchers have explored before so that you'll be able to find plenty of relevant sources to review.

- Your research doesn't need to be exhaustive. Pay careful attention to bibliographies. Focus on the most frequently cited literature about your topic and literature from the best known scholars in your field. Ask yourself: "Does this source make a significant contribution to the understanding of my topic?"
- Reading other literature reviews from your field may help you get ideas for themes to look for in your research. You can usually find some of these through the library databases by adding literature review as a keyword in your search.
- Start with the most recent publications and work backwards. This way, you ensure you have the most current information, and it becomes easier to identify the most seminal earlier sources by reviewing the material that current researchers are citing.

The organization of your lit review should be determined based on what you'd like to highlight from your research. Here are a few suggestions:
- Chronology : Discuss literature in chronological order of its writing/publication to demonstrate a change in trends over time or to detail a history of controversy in the field or of developments in the understanding of your topic.
- Theme: Group your sources by subject or theme to show the variety of angles from which your topic has been studied. This works well if, for example, your goal is to identify an angle or subtopic that has so far been overlooked by researchers.
- Methodology: Grouping your sources by methodology (for example, dividing the literature into qualitative vs. quantitative studies or grouping sources according to the populations studied) is useful for illustrating an overlooked population, an unused or underused methodology, or a flawed experimental technique.

- Be selective. Highlight only the most important and relevant points from a source in your review.
- Use quotes sparingly. Short quotes can help to emphasize a point, but thorough analysis of language from each source is generally unnecessary in a literature review.
- Synthesize your sources. Your goal is not to make a list of summaries of each source but to show how the sources relate to one another and to your own work.
- Make sure that your own voice and perspective remains front and center. Don't rely too heavily on summary or paraphrasing. For each source, draw a conclusion about how it relates to your own work or to the other literature on your topic.
- Be objective. When you identify a disagreement in the literature, be sure to represent both sides. Don't exclude a source simply on the basis that it does not support your own research hypothesis.
- At the end of your lit review, make suggestions for future research. What subjects, populations, methodologies, or theoretical lenses warrant further exploration? What common flaws or biases did you identify that could be corrected in future studies?

- Double check that you've correctly cited each of the sources you've used in the citation style requested by your professor (APA, MLA, etc.) and that your lit review is formatted according to the guidelines for that style.
Your literature review should:
- Be focused on and organized around your topic.
- Synthesize your research into a summary of what is and is not known about your topic.
- Identify any gaps or areas of controversy in the literature related to your topic.
- Suggest questions that require further research.
- Have your voice and perspective at the forefront rather than merely summarizing others' work.
- Cyberbullying: How Physical Intimidation Influences the Way People are Bullied
- Use of Propofol and Emergence Agitation in Children
- Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza's 'Ethics'
- Literature Review Tutorials and Samples - Wilson Library at University of La Verne
- Literature Reviews: Introduction - University Library at Georgia State
- Literature Reviews - The Writing Center at UNC Chapel Hill
- Writing a Literature Review - Boston College Libraries
- Write a Literature Review - University Library at UC Santa Cruz
- << Previous: ASA Style
- Next: Course Pages >>
- Last Updated: Mar 10, 2023 3:47 PM
- URL: https://researchguides.elac.edu/Sociology
- Subject List
- Take a Tour
- For Authors
- Subscriber Services
- Publications
- African American Studies
- African Studies
- American Literature
- Anthropology
- Architecture Planning and Preservation
- Art History
- Atlantic History
- Biblical Studies
- British and Irish Literature
- Childhood Studies
- Chinese Studies
- Cinema and Media Studies
- Communication
- Criminology
- Environmental Science
- Evolutionary Biology
- International Law
- International Relations
- Islamic Studies
- Jewish Studies
- Latin American Studies
- Latino Studies
- Linguistics
- Literary and Critical Theory
- Medieval Studies
- Military History
- Political Science
- Public Health
- Renaissance and Reformation
- Social Work
- Urban Studies
- Victorian Literature
- Browse All Subjects
How to Subscribe
- Free Trials
In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section History of Sociology
Introduction, general overviews.
- The Grand Figures
- Organized Pre-Sociology
- American Sociology to 1945
- Chicago Sociology
- Karl Mannheim and Gunnar Myrdal
- Postwar United States
- Quantitative Social Research
- Social Psychology
- Three Sociological Specialties: Rural Sociology, Criminology, and Medical Sociology
- The Frankfurt School and European Contemporaries
- Women in Sociology and Reform
Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about
About related articles close popup.
Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet
Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.
- Auguste Comte
- Chicago School of Sociology
- Frankfurt School
- Émile Durkheim
- Social Theory
- Symbolic Interactionism
Other Subject Areas
Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.
- Cities and Crime
- Conventions and Categories in Markets
- Street Gangs
- Find more forthcoming articles...
- Export Citations
History of Sociology by Stephen Turner LAST REVIEWED: 10 August 2020 LAST MODIFIED: 21 January 2016 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0140
The history of sociology is both a traditional area of sociology itself and a part of the history of the social sciences as studied by intellectual historians and historians of science. The earliest writings on the subject were completed by sociologists attempting to construct a canon and a history of the discipline reaching into the distant past. This style of history remained important in sociology for a very long period in American sociology and was part of the original remit of the flagship journal of what was then called the American Sociological Society in 1936. This changed after 1945 with the generation of Robert Merton and Talcott Parsons but persisted in Europe as academic sociology was refounded in specific national academic settings as a taught field and in the light of a new internationalism. Historians began writing in earnest about the subject in the 1960s and 1970s. There is a traditional divide between “disciplinary histories” written by members of the discipline and writings by professional historians. Although this line has blurred in recent years, there is a basic distinction between work that is historical in the sense of being based on archives and work that interprets books. Both are found here. Sociology has generally been less celebratory of its own history than psychology and lacks the rich autobiographical material that psychology has generated, but there is now a certain amount of online material, sometimes in the form of oral history interviews for university archives, that tells the stories of individual careers, and a small number of books that can serve as primary sources. Sociology also has a close relation to social reform, so the historian of sociology needs to understand the various reform movements and organizations that interacted with it. British developments paralleled American reform movements and require a similar approach. In Europe, there was also a social reform movement prior to Second World War, but it was eclipsed by the postwar welfare state and the ideological movements of the Left, which have a complex and largely unanalyzed relation to academic sociology. These relations are clearer in the context of the Frankfurt School, which was not a part of academic sociology originally but which later produced academic sociologists in Germany and elsewhere in Europe and influenced many sociologists internationally. More recently, the discipline as well as the history of sociology itself has been influenced by the women’s movement. This bibliography attempts to provide the rudiments of a background to researchers and students with an interest in this rich history.
General overviews of the history of social thought leading to and including the era of scientific sociology were characteristic of the early decades of sociology. This genre is virtually nonexistent today. However, some of these early anthologies still have considerable value as guides to relatively obscure figures in the history of sociology and as evidence of the thinking of their authors, who are now of historical interest. The differences in the books reflect very different interpretations of the past and different eras of interpretation. Among the major overviews are Sorokin 1928 , which makes shrewd observations that are still relevant today, and Ellwood 1938 , a bestseller with a public audience that paralleled standard American texts in the history of philosophy and the history of political theory but was side-lined during the postwar period. Barnes and Becker 1938 is even more comprehensive. Parsons 1937 was an attempt to reorient the canon and succeeded in doing so. McDonald 1993 provides a feminist reinterpretation of the canon, bringing in many women. The most recent major attempt at comprehensive coverage is Levine 1995 . Coser 1977 was a standard source in the 1970s, and the choices of subjects and interpretation reflect the era, but it remains valuable as an introduction to the thinkers in the canon of the time.
Barnes, Harry Elmer, and Howard Becker. 1938. Social thought from lore to science . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
This is a huge compendium of social thinkers with no subsequent parallel that is exceptionally cosmopolitan
Coser, Louis. 1977. Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Although this is a textbook, it was a dominant source for biographical interpretation in the 1960s and remains accessible and readable. Originally published in 1971.
Ellwood, Charles. 1938. A history of social philosophy . New York: Prentice Hall.
A bestseller in its time, this book explicates thinkers from the Enlightenment to the early 20th century by placing their thought in context and in relation to others.
Levine, Donald. 1995. Visions of the sociological tradition . Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
A large, reflexive, and very up-to-date reconsideration of the tradition.
McDonald, Lynn. 1993. The early origins of the social sciences . Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press.
Beginning with the Greeks, this book is concerned with recognizing feminist issues and women social thinkers.
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The structure of social action . New York: Free Press.
A flawed but influential classic, which promoted the canonical status of Max Weber and Émile Durkheim in its time.
Sorokin, Pitirim. 1928. Contemporary sociological theories . New York: Harper.
Sorokin’s contemporaries are our classics. The book is full of shrewd comments on key ideas in sociology.
back to top
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .
- About Sociology »
- Meet the Editorial Board »
- Adolescence
- African Americans
- African Societies
- Agent-Based Modeling
- Analysis, Spatial
- Analysis, World-Systems
- Anomie and Strain Theory
- Arab Spring, Mobilization, and Contentious Politics in the...
- Asian Americans
- Assimilation
- Authority and Work
- Bell, Daniel
- Biosociology
- Bourdieu, Pierre
- Catholicism
- Causal Inference
- Chinese Cultural Revolution
- Chinese Society
- Citizenship
- Civil Rights
- Civil Society
- Cognitive Sociology
- Cohort Analysis
- Collective Efficacy
- Collective Memory
- Comparative Historical Sociology
- Comte, Auguste
- Conflict Theory
- Conservatism
- Consumer Culture
- Consumption
- Contemporary Family Issues
- Contingent Work
- Conversation Analysis
- Corrections
- Cosmopolitanism
- Cultural Capital
- Cultural Classification and Codes
- Cultural Omnivorousness
- Cultural Production and Circulation
- Culture and Networks
- Culture, Sociology of
- Development
- Discrimination
- Doing Gender
- Du Bois, W.E.B.
- Durkheim, Émile
- Economic Institutions and Institutional Change
- Economic Sociology
- Education and Health
- Education Policy in the United States
- Educational Policy and Race
- Empires and Colonialism
- Entrepreneurship
- Environmental Sociology
- Epistemology
- Ethnic Enclaves
- Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis
- Exchange Theory
- Families, Postmodern
- Family Policies
- Feminist Theory
- Field, Bourdieu's Concept of
- Forced Migration
- Foucault, Michel
- Gender and Bodies
- Gender and Crime
- Gender and Education
- Gender and Health
- Gender and Incarceration
- Gender and Professions
- Gender and Social Movements
- Gender and Work
- Gender Pay Gap
- Gender, Sexuality, and Migration
- Gender Stratification
- Gender, Welfare Policy and
- Gendered Sexuality
- Gentrification
- Gerontology
- Globalization and Labor
- Goffman, Erving
- Historic Preservation
- Human Trafficking
- Immigration
- Indian Society, Contemporary
- Institutions
- Intellectuals
- Intersectionalities
- Interview Methodology
- Job Quality
- Knowledge, Critical Sociology of
- Labor Markets
- Latino/Latina Studies
- Law and Society
- Law, Sociology of
- LGBT Parenting and Family Formation
- LGBT Social Movements
- Life Course
- Lipset, S.M.
- Marriage and Divorce
- Marxist Sociology
- Masculinity
- Mass Incarceration in the United States and its Collateral...
- Material Culture
- Mathematical Sociology
- Medical Sociology
- Mental Illness
- Methodological Individualism
- Middle Classes
- Military Sociology
- Money and Credit
- Multiculturalism
- Multilevel Models
- Multiracial, Mixed-Race, and Biracial Identities
- Nationalism
- Non-normative Sexuality Studies
- Occupations and Professions
- Organizations
- Panel Studies
- Parsons, Talcott
- Political Culture
- Political Economy
- Political Sociology
- Popular Culture
- Proletariat (Working Class)
- Protestantism
- Public Opinion
- Public Space
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
- Race and Sexuality
- Race and Violence
- Race and Youth
- Race in Global Perspective
- Race, Organizations, and Movements
- Rational Choice
- Relationships
- Religion and the Public Sphere
- Residential Segregation
- Revolutions
- Role Theory
- Rural Sociology
- Scientific Networks
- Secularization
- Sequence Analysis
- Sex versus Gender
- Sexual Identity
- Sexualities
- Sexuality Across the Life Course
- Simmel, Georg
- Single Parents in Context
- Social Capital
- Social Change
- Social Closure
- Social Construction of Crime
- Social Control
- Social Darwinism
- Social Disorganization Theory
- Social Epidemiology
- Social History
- Social Indicators
- Social Mobility
- Social Movements
- Social Network Analysis
- Social Networks
- Social Policy
- Social Problems
- Social Stratification
- Socialization, Sociological Perspectives on
- Sociolinguistics
- Sociological Approaches to Character
- Sociological Research on the Chinese Society
- Sociological Research, Qualitative Methods in
- Sociological Research, Quantitative Methods in
- Sociology, History of
- Sociology of Manners
- Sociology of Music
- Sociology of War, The
- Suburbanism
- Survey Methods
- Symbolic Boundaries
- The Division of Labor after Durkheim
- Tilly, Charles
- Time Use and Childcare
- Time Use and Time Diary Research
- Tourism, Sociology of
- Transnational Adoption
- Unions and Inequality
- Urban Ethnography
- Urban Growth Machine
- Urban Inequality in the United States
- Veblen, Thorstein
- Visual Arts, Music, and Aesthetic Experience
- Wallerstein, Immanuel
- Welfare, Race, and the American Imagination
- Welfare States
- Women’s Employment and Economic Inequality Between Househo...
- Work and Employment, Sociology of
- Work/Life Balance
- Workplace Flexibility
- Privacy Policy
- Cookie Policy
- Legal Notice
- Accessibility
Powered by:
- [162.248.224.4]
- 162.248.224.4
Historical Literature Review
The appearance in 1983 of U.S. News and World Report ratings of U.S. colleges based on a survey of college presidents (Solorzano and Quick 1983) marked the beginning of the modern era in rankings, with a shift in emphasis from small studies in scholarly publications to a national comparison for a general audience. By 1990, the magazine's rankings included university provided student and faculty measures to go along with the initial “reputational “ survey of college presidents, Governments and scholars had been publishing quality or research rankings for over 100 years. Salmi and Saroyan (2007) examine rankings and public accountability and also identify statistical annual reports published by the Commission of the US Bureau of Education from 1870–1890 that classified institutions.
Pagell and Lusk (2002) discuss a series of early scholarly business school rankings. The earliest work they cite, Raymond Hughes' “A Study of Graduate School of America”, published on behalf of the America Council of Education., rated 19 graduate departments in the U.S., primarily Ivy League private universities and the major mid-western state universities. All but three of his initial 19 do not appear on one of this article's list of top 30 worldwide universities today (See Table 8 below). Magnoun (1966) compares additional studies using Hughes methodology and analyzes the consistencies and changes during the 40 year interval. He emphasizes the importance of the rankings to university administration and the importance of quality graduate programs to the country as a whole. Other studies that Pagell and Lusk examine focus on individual departments and they count pages, publications and weighted page counts. The American Educational Research Association sponsored research rankings in the 1970s (Blau and Margulies 1974; Schubert 1979). Kroc introduces citation analysis for schools of education and analyzes early challenges using Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), many of which persist today (Kroc 1984). These earlier rankings focused on specific departments in a limited number of U S universities. While scholarly rankings in today's higher education environment are global, individual disciplines continue to use their own rankings. For example, Jin published two studies on economic rankings in East Asia relying on Econlit and page counts(Jin and Yau 1999; Jin and Hong 2008). The economics open access repository RePEc contains numerous rankings using multiple metrics, based on authors' deposits in the repository (IDEAS 2013).
No one ranking is “correct”. However, there is a consistency across top rankings. In the scholarly surveys this paper cites, spanning 1925 to 2014, employing peer review and a variety of counting methodologies across different subject categories, a limited number of schools are number one with Harvard leading the way.


We use cookies to give you the best experience possible.
By continuing we’ll assume you are on board with our cookie policy
Sociology Literature Review

Sociology Literature Review: Get Effective Tips for Successful Writing
If you are majoring in Sociology, it is important to be well aware of how to write a sociology literature review on the given topic. Particularly, you need to have in-depth knowledge of the specific steps on how to organize your pre-writing and writing stage of a literature review.
- First, make sure you have sufficient time to prepare the necessary literature for sociology literature review writing. In particular, find the necessary books, journals, and articles that are related to your topic and make sure you highlight the main information from them that can be further used in your review. As a rule, you can find these publications in peer- reviewed journals, books, articles, and even specific websites.
- Second, gather information pertaining to your topic. As you read the chosen materials, make sure you make notes and jot down all-important information that may be used in your sociology literature review.
- Third, as soon as you have collected information and organized the most important facts, make sure you combine the units of information logically and apply it to specific parts of your paper. The information you have gathered should help you properly discuss the topic and address it in detail.
- After you have a complete picture in your mind of what your paper should look like, formulate the main working hypotheses. The hypotheses should be measurable and specific and meet such criteria as relation of the hypothesis to the topic (how it is connected or related to it) and what specific steps were taken to collect the necessary data.
- Finally, come up with conclusions: take a look back at your paper and pinpoint to what you have discussed, what the main findings are, etc.
How to Start a Sociology Literature Review?
First of all, make sure you compose an outline. Even though any students consider it as a waste of time, it actually helps you to save time in the very process of writing and developing ideas and arguments in the paper. With a developed outline, you will be able to stay more focused on the very discussion, as you will have a backbone of your paper in front of your eyes. When working on an outline, you will develop a plan of what your paper will look like. Writing an outline is helpful when you are working on different types of papers. When it comes to a literature review outline , make sure that the structure differs depending on the type of review, namely whether it is historical or argumentative.

When it comes to a historical review, you need to narrow down the topic and focus on the specific aspect that defines the very event under discussion. When you work on a historical literature review sociology, make sure to consider the following aspects:
- Focus on a specific period and make sure you can provide justification as to why you have chosen to focus on a specific point.
- If you have chosen a specific historical period or epoch, make sure you discuss what was decisive for your choice and why this particular epoch is worth consideration and attention (what lies behind its significance).
- Further, come up with specific ideas that either support the topic or disprove it.
If you have selected an argumentative literature review, the argument you put forward should ether support or refute your main idea in the topic. Once you have developed a specific viewpoint or argument, you should consistently develop it and link all the ideas to the central claim.
Customer's review on Sitejabber
" Many thanks to this custom writing service for being so passionate and getting in contact with me everytime I needed. "
Alicia D. reviewed Essaysworld.net on May 30, 2018 via SiteJabber Click to see the original review on an external website. ? Learn more about our commitment to verified reviews.
How to Write a Literature Review Sociology?
When working on a literature review in sociology, make sure you are aware of specific methods or strategies that will help you develop a high-quality paper. First of all, you need to provide a comprehensive literature review that is different from the already existent literature reviews on the same topic. Overall, if you need to provide a literature review APA, you need to follow a specific plan:
- select the title carefully and attentively;
- come up with relevant literature pertaining to the topic;
- make sure you analyze the sources in depth;
- provide a concise and comprehensive summary of the literature;
- compose a review.
How and Where to Find Sources for a Successful Literature Review?
Students frequently worry about where they can find appropriate and legitimate sources for their literature review in sociology. Actually, you can use any sources as long as they are credible and updated. You can use the Internet sources , books, journal articles, newspapers, magazines, online databases and libraries, and many other media of information if you need to find some sources. When organizing the review, it is advisable to use ASA writing and formatting style. Before submitting the literature review, make sure you clarify how long the review should be. You need to adhere to the requirements of the stated paper length so that you write as much as it is necessary. The literature review should perfectly fit into the paper and not exceed the length of the main body. To ease you the task of literature review writing , you may browse some sociology literature review example online and have a look at how it is organized and how many words it takes up.
How to Conduct a Literature Review in an Effective Way?
Once you have selected the topic for your literature review, you need to research the relevant information and make sure it is clearly discussed within the paper. However, for many students, one of the most challenging aspects of literature review writing is to come up with an appealing and effective sociology topic. To ease you this task, we have composed a list of sociology literature review topics that will provide you some fresh ideas on writing. Check a few of them out:
- Abortion. Provide a comprehensive discussion of different viewpoints on abortion (pro-choice and pro-life). What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of them?
- Comparisons between different cultures. Choose any culture and compare it with the American one. Focus on different aspects and characteristics of culture and pinpoint to the similarities and differences are.
- Focus on the problem of child abuse and why it is so pressing in the modern society.
- Transgender, gay, bi, and lesbian, Focus on these non-conforming society groups. Explore the differences between them and discuss what difficulties they may encounter in the society.
- The issue of domestic abuse: investigate its reasons and outcomes. What may be the leading cause of this problem?
- Marriage and family. Discuss how the perception of marriage and family life has evolved during the last 10-20 years.
- Pressing social issues in the modern society. Highlight 3-5 social problems that are most urgent in the modern society and discuss them in detail.
- Social stance and the way it impacts the general education.
- How can social status be based on emotional perception? How can emotions shape social structures?
- Gender, culture, and race: How do these aspects influence the society?
What to Take into Consideration While Working on a Literature Review?
- First of all, you need to know for sure how long should a literature review be. It will help you plan your time for preparation and this information will be also considered when collecting specific sources.
- Second, to be attentive and concentrated on writing, make sure you get rid of all the possible distractors, such as mobile phones, friends, social networks, household chores, etc.
- Therefore, if you cannot find a calm place to practice at home, think of gong to the library. Once you have selected a place for studying, make sure you decide how much time daily you are ready to spend on the assignment. It is a must that you work on it regularly and consistently.
- Another great piece of advice is to get enough sleep and energy, so do not skip meals and get enough hydration.
Get a Free Price Quote
First-Timer? Join!
How to Be Effective in Literature Review Writing?
- Carefully read instructions and make sure you understand them. You need to be well aware what you are expected to write.
- Make sure you first check the recommended literature and then search for some additional sources if you need them.
- Do not refer to the articles by full title as you mention them in text. Just state, “The research found,” “According to the study,” etc. Full titles of the articles should be mentioned in the reference list.
- When mentioning the authors, refer to them by their last names.
- Make sure you clearly outline the main findings of the article. Pinpoint to the results and findings, state why they are significant.
- Do not provide any personal information in the literature review – sharing your personal experience is not applicable in this type of writing. Just write to the point. Moreover, personal stories will look subjective and biased.
- Make sure you understand the difference between a book report and a literature review. You do not need to merely summarize the sources but rather pinpoint to their significance.
- To provide a comprehensive and detailed discussion of the topic, make sure you review a sufficient number of sources.
- Always check your paper for plagiarism before submitting it. You need to make sure the findings do not repeat some other works and are properly cited.
READY to ORDER?
Save Time And Let Professionals Work On Your Academic Papers
Penn State University Libraries
Soc 001: introductory sociology.
- Literature Reviews: Strategies for Writing
- Fake News and Evaluating Sources
Literature Reviews
What is a Literature Review? The literature review is a critical look at the existing research that is significant to the work that you are carrying out. This overview identifies prominent research trends in addition to assessing the overall strengths and weaknesses of the existing research.
Purpose of the Literature Review
- To provide background information about a research topic.
- To establish the importance of a topic.
- To demonstrate familiarity with a topic/problem.
- To “carve out a space” for further work and allow you to position yourself in a scholarly conversation.
Characteristics of an effective literature review In addition to fulfilling the purposes outlined above, an effective literature review provides a critical overview of existing research by
- Outlining important research trends.
- Assessing strengths and weaknesses (of individual studies as well the existing research as a whole).
- Identifying potential gaps in knowledge.
- Establishing a need for current and/or future research projects.

Steps of the Literature Review Process
1) Planning: identify the focus, type, scope and discipline of the review you intend to write. 2) Reading and Research: collect and read current research on your topic. Select only those sources that are most relevant to your project. 3) Analyzing: summarize, synthesize, critique, and compare your sources in order to assess the field of research as a whole. 4) Drafting: develop a thesis or claim to make about the existing research and decide how to organize your material. 5) Revising: revise and finalize the structural, stylistic, and grammatical issues of your paper.
This process is not always a linear process; depending on the size and scope of your literature review, you may find yourself returning to some of these steps repeatedly as you continue to focus your project.
These steps adapted from the full workshop offered by the Graduate Writing Center at Penn State.
Literature Review Format
Introduction
- Provide an overview of the topic, theme, or issue.
- Identify your specific area of focus.
- Describe your methodology and rationale. How did you decide which sources to include and which to exclude? Why? How is your review organized?
- Briefly discuss the overall trends in the published scholarship in this area.
- Establish your reason for writing the review.
- Find the best organizational method for your review.
- Summarize sources by providing the most relevant information.
- Respectfully and objectively critique and evaluate the studies.
- Use direct quotations sparingly and only if appropriate.
Conclusion
- Summarize the major findings of the sources that you reviewed, remembering to keep the focus on your topic.
- Evaluate the current state of scholarship in this area (ex. flaws or gaps in the research, inconsistencies in findings)
- Identify any areas for further research.
- Conclude by making a connection between your topic and some larger area of study such as the discipline.
- << Previous: Home
- Next: Fake News and Evaluating Sources >>
- Last Updated: Jul 29, 2022 10:43 PM
- URL: https://guides.libraries.psu.edu/shenangosoc001
We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.
- Essay Writer Service >
- Topic Collections
120 Fresh and Thought-Provoking Topics for Literature Reviews in Different Disciplines
A literature review is an account of the scholarly works published on a topic. It is different from an annotated bibliography – and far more interesting at that. Instead of being just a list of summaries, a literature review synthesizes the information from all available sources in an overall relationship to your guiding concept. This may be the problem you are discussing, a statement you are arguing, a theory you are verifying, etc.
The goals of a literature review may vary:
- giving a historical overview of the research in the field
- summarizing the existing state of the topic
- finding a problem or a gap in the research field
- developing a new theory, etc.
That is why good literature review topics are often formulated as research questions. This type of paper is not an easy writing. You will need to parse immense volumes of information, synthesize and summarize coherently. You also need to devote plenty of time to reading.
This post contains a list of literature review topics suggested for various subjects. However, when choosing the most fitting one to dig into, ask yourself, what are the passions that you can apply to this research? This assignment will take a while, so you will need more than just a good study discipline to soldier on. A bit of enthusiasm and intrinsic motivation will get you much farther.
Literature Review Topics Examples on English and World Literature
Some of the suggestions in this post are linked to literature review examples in our free database. By clicking on a title, you get to a corresponding sample page, where you can read the entire text. If the topic you like isn't linked, but you would like to read an example, you can order it. We will arrange the most qualified paper writer to prepare it for you exclusively.
Ready? Let's start with topics for literature review papers on English and World Literature.
- Phoenix as a symbol for endurance in a worn path
- The novel Intuition by Allegra Goodman
- Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Birthmark through Girard's Lens
- Ender's Game by an Orson Scott Card
- Depiction of freedom and happiness in Brave New World
- Feminism and Post-Colonialism in Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake and Suzanne Collins's The Hunger Games
- Rationality, logic, and mathematics in the novel The Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Night-Time
- Victims of their time as a character type in the World literature
- The last days of Judas Iscariot : a play by Stephen Adly Guirgis
- The use of symbolism in Kafka's prose
- Naturalism in American literature
- Grotesque and Sublime in the prose of Edgar Allan Poe
Lit Review Topic Ideas on Science and Technology
Next are some literature review topic ideas on science and technology.
- Electronic library and effects of its implementation
- Benjamin Franklin: scientist and inventor
- Virtual Reality, science fiction, and society today
- Science, Technology, and Society as a field of knowledge
- Frederick Winslow Taylor and the principles of scientific management
- What is the future of work
- Concepts of science and technology
- The Abolition of Man by C.S. Lewis and influence of technological advancement on man and nature
- Types of machine learning
- Internet of Things and biometrics: implications, benefits, threats
- Emotional intelligence and natural language processing
- SmartCity projects that have already been implemented and their lessons
As the field is vast, we can barely scratch the surface with these suggestions. To help you with brainstorming, here are a few tips on how to choose good topics for a literature review yourself:
- Make sure the topic ties nicely with class requirements as well as your interests
- Do some preliminary research to see if there is enough literature on your topic
- Scale up if the information is scarce or down if there are too many sources to handle
- Use sources recommended for reading in the class materials
- Supplement the list with only trustworthy scholarly sources
Follow these guidelines, and you are on a path to some great ideas!
Psychology Literature Review Topics
When brainstorming topics on psychology, don't forget about the subdisciplines: biopsychology, social, educational, organizational, etc. If the suggestions below won't be enough, try looking for inspiration in Biology, Sociology, Education, or Business. The most exciting topics are often at the intersection of different areas of knowledge!
- Tricyclic antidepressants vs. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) in treatment of depression
- Stress, its causes, effects, and coping strategies
- The family system and psychology
- Tibetan compassion practices: working with terror, trauma, and transcendence
- Behaviorism psychology
- Culture and psychopathology
- Correlation between diet and cognitive functions in primary school students
- The evolutionary role of phobias and intrusive thoughts
- Popular psychology and its implications
- PTSD in mass disasters survivors: immediate relief and long-term assistance
- Cults and vulnerable populations
- False memories and gaslighting
Nursing Literature Review Topics
Nursing lit review topics are probably the most diverse in scale, as you can see from the examples below. They can describe a larger issue or a concrete solution applied to a narrowly defined problem. Following this principle, you can modify our lit review topics suggestions zooming out or in on the subject material.
- Legalization of medical marijuana and its effects on the youth
- Health effects of fiber: research findings
- Achieving higher levels of education and training for nurses
- Organic foods and cardiovascular disease
- The importance of Central Venous Line (CVL) and Central Venous Access Devices (CVAD)
- What effects do different types of music have on humans and their mental health?
- The use of laboratory-grown organs for transplantation
- The role of xylitol in alleviating dry mouth
- The detection of tar and nicotine content of cigarette smoke extract using HPLC
- Rheumatoid arthritis: etiology, diagnosis, vulnerable populations
- Mobility aids for the elderly and quality of life
- The role of play in the recuperation of hospitalized children
Education Literature Review Topics
To get more ideas from these literature review topic examples, try isolating an issue and put it in another educational context. For instance, student motivation in primary school vs. middle school or sleep deprivation in high school vs. college. This should give you plenty of material for brainstorming.
- Simulation education for crisis prevention program
- A critical consideration of the new pedagogy in its relation to modern science
- Lack of students interest in studying science
- Discovery-based learning and student-centered learning with a focus on mathematics at a high school level
- The adverse effects of sleep deprivation on academic performance: a college student's struggle
- Gender bias in special education programs
- Higher education for senior citizens: challenges and best practices
- Significant challenges of the teaching profession in the US
- Factors contributing to international student mobility
- Student motivation in private vs. state colleges
- Benefits and challenges of homeschooling for students and families
- Correlation between workload, stress levels, and self-esteem in middle-school students
Sociology Literature Review Topics
The best advice on finding current sociology topics is to look at the challenges your community faces. Become the first one to notice and address these issues!
- Are video games affecting our current and future students ?
- Ways to prevent social media bullying
- Spanking of children in the USA
- The relation of poverty and exposure to crime in adolescent men
- Transgender discrimination
- The link between science and Utopia in Utopia and the New Atlantis
- Effectiveness of group therapy in social work
- Peer pressure, depression, and causes of suicide in the adolescents
- Religious separatism social issues connected with it
- Causes and effects of domestic abuse
- Physical appearance and social status
- Race, nationality, ethnicity, and identity
Political Science Literature Review Topics
Political science is one of the more formal disciplines on this list. Being heavy with abstract concepts, it doesn't lend itself easily to casual brainstorming. Well, at least start with these:
- Electoral College, its functions, and role in public life
- Why American and the British IPE are so different
- Contingency planning
- Effects of political gerrymandering
- American political parties
- The present urban regimes in Canada
- International policies and domestic regulations: precedence and clashes
- Tolerance as a political virtue
- Grassroots activism and its impact on state and federal law
- National security and constitutional freedoms
- Historical analysis of anarchism
- The effect of social media on civic engagement
Criminal Justice Literature Review Topics
Criminal justice is a complex field. It's ripe with variance and challenges – which is good for topic ideas at least. And you have state, federal, and international levels to add more variables.
- Juvenile justice and the Missouri model
- Car-related crime in the USA
- An analysis of the impact of sexual harassment/sexual assault in the military
- The process of the arbitration without the involvement of national courts
- Serial killers and profiling
- Policing and criminal justice systems
- Psychological effects of cyberbullying on adolescents
- Sexual human trafficking from the Central America region
- Human sex-trafficking: the Canadian perspective
- Gender and racial bias in criminal investigations
- Possible ethical and legal dilemmas of using sniffer dogs
- Sting operations vs. entrapment: ethics and regulations
Chemistry and Biology Literature Review Topics
Biology is fascinating. It has something for everyone: from biochemistry and genetics to ecosystems and nature preservation. Here are some suggestions to guide your choice:
- Brain size correlation
- Haruko Obokata, ethics of stem cells research, and scientific misconduct
- Genomic and molecular genetics major and its perspectives for students
- DNA use in mass disasters
- DNA detection from dried blood spots
- Captive breeding of marine mammals: pros and cons
- The Dynamics of ER and mitochondria
- Biomarkers in gastric cancer treatment
- The chemistry behind gene splicing
- Carcinogens and hyper-processed foods
- Primates and monkeys as potential sources of novel zoonotic infections
- Natural gases, ecosystems, and the global warming
Business and Marketing Literature Review Topics
Finally, here are some business and marketing topics as well. These disciplines might be relatively new, but they are among the most dynamic and information-rich – which means great fun to explore.
- Effectiveness of neuromarketing in comparison to traditional marketing methods
- Green supply chain management
- Effectiveness of e-marketing to non-profit making organizations
- The value of information
- Shareholder engagement/activism and corporate performance
- The relationship between ethics, stress, and productivity in the workplace
- The role of integrity in business
- Client confidentiality and its role in a prosperous business
- Businesses, their impact on the community, and social responsibility
- Startup fundraising stages
- Innovative marketing in the age of instant feedback: risks and possibilities
- Strategies for staff motivation

Jana Rooheart
Jana Rooheart came to WowEssays.com with a mission to put together and then slice and dice our vast practical experience in crafting all kinds of academic papers. Jana is an aspired blogger with rich expertise in psychology, digital learning tools, and creative writing. In this blog, she willingly shares tricks of pencraft and mind-altering ideas about academic writing any student will find utterly beneficial.
Share with friends using:

275 words = 1 page double-spaced
Looking for essays to inspire you? We have samples of all types on any topic under the sun!
Popular types of paper.
- 3000 Word Essays
Recently Uploaded Samples
Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]
Use your new password to log in
You are not register!
By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .
Now you can download documents directly to your device!
Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.
Short on a deadline?
Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED
No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Geography & Travel
- Health & Medicine
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- World History
- On This Day in History
- Biographies
- Top Questions
- Week In Review
- Infographics
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- One Good Fact
- Britannica Explains In these videos, Britannica explains a variety of topics and answers frequently asked questions.
- Britannica Classics Check out these retro videos from Encyclopedia Britannica’s archives.
- #WTFact Videos In #WTFact Britannica shares some of the most bizarre facts we can find.
- This Time in History In these videos, find out what happened this month (or any month!) in history.
- Demystified Videos In Demystified, Britannica has all the answers to your burning questions.
- Student Portal Britannica is the ultimate student resource for key school subjects like history, government, literature, and more.
- COVID-19 Portal While this global health crisis continues to evolve, it can be useful to look to past pandemics to better understand how to respond today.
- 100 Women Britannica celebrates the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, highlighting suffragists and history-making politicians.
- Britannica Beyond We’ve created a new place where questions are at the center of learning. Go ahead. Ask. We won’t mind.
- Saving Earth Britannica Presents Earth’s To-Do List for the 21st Century. Learn about the major environmental problems facing our planet and what can be done about them!
- SpaceNext50 Britannica presents SpaceNext50, From the race to the Moon to space stewardship, we explore a wide range of subjects that feed our curiosity about space!
- Introduction
Founding the discipline
- Economic determinism
- Human ecology
- Social psychology
- Cultural theory
- Early functionalism
- The functionalist-conflict debate
- Rising segmentation of the discipline
- Social stratification
- Interdisciplinary influences
- The historical divide: qualitative and establishment sociology
- Methodological considerations in sociology
- Ecological patterning
- Experiments
- Statistics and mathematical analysis
- Data collection
- National methodological preferences
- Academic status
- Scientific status
- Current trends
- Emerging roles for sociologists
- sociology summary
- Related Content
- More Articles On This Topic
- Additional Reading
- Contributors
- Article History
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- Social Science LibreTexts - What Is Sociology?
- sociology - Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 8-11)
- sociology - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)
- Table Of Contents

Read a brief summary of this topic
sociology , a social science that studies human societies, their interactions, and the processes that preserve and change them. It does this by examining the dynamics of constituent parts of societies such as institutions, communities , populations, and gender, racial, or age groups. Sociology also studies social status or stratification, social movements , and social change , as well as societal disorder in the form of crime, deviance , and revolution .
Social life overwhelmingly regulates the behaviour of humans , largely because humans lack the instincts that guide most animal behaviour . Humans therefore depend on social institutions and organizations to inform their decisions and actions. Given the important role organizations play in influencing human action, it is sociology’s task to discover how organizations affect the behaviour of persons, how they are established, how organizations interact with one another, how they decay, and, ultimately, how they disappear. Among the most basic organizational structures are economic, religious, educational, and political institutions, as well as more specialized institutions such as the family, the community , the military, peer groups, clubs, and volunteer associations.
Sociology, as a generalizing social science, is surpassed in its breadth only by anthropology —a discipline that encompasses archaeology , physical anthropology , and linguistics . The broad nature of sociological inquiry causes it to overlap with other social sciences such as economics , political science , psychology , geography , education , and law . Sociology’s distinguishing feature is its practice of drawing on a larger societal context to explain social phenomena.
Sociologists also utilize some aspects of these other fields. Psychology and sociology, for instance, share an interest in the subfield of social psychology , although psychologists traditionally focus on individuals and their mental mechanisms. Sociology devotes most of its attention to the collective aspects of human behaviour , because sociologists place greater emphasis on the ways external groups influence the behaviour of individuals.
The field of social anthropology has been historically quite close to sociology. Until about the first quarter of the 20th century, the two subjects were usually combined in one department (especially in Britain), differentiated mainly by anthropology’s emphasis on the sociology of preliterate peoples. Recently, however, this distinction has faded, as social anthropologists have turned their interests toward the study of modern culture .
Two other social sciences, political science and economics, developed largely from the practical interests of nations. Increasingly, both fields have recognized the utility of sociological concepts and methods. A comparable synergy has also developed with respect to law, education, and religion and even in such contrasting fields as engineering and architecture. All of these fields can benefit from the study of institutions and social interaction.
Historical development of sociology
Though sociology draws on the Western tradition of rational inquiry established by the ancient Greeks, it is specifically the offspring of 18th- and 19th-century philosophy and has been viewed, along with economics and political science, as a reaction against speculative philosophy and folklore. Consequently, sociology separated from moral philosophy to become a specialized discipline. While he is not credited with the founding of the discipline of sociology, French philosopher Auguste Comte is recognized for having coined the term sociology .
The founders of sociology spent decades searching for the proper direction of the new discipline. They tried several highly divergent pathways, some driven by methods and contents borrowed from other sciences, others invented by the scholars themselves. To better view the various turns the discipline has taken, the development of sociology may be divided into four periods: the establishment of the discipline from the late 19th century until World War I , interwar consolidation, explosive growth from 1945 to 1975, and the subsequent period of segmentation.
Some of the earliest sociologists developed an approach based on Darwinian evolutionary theory. In their attempts to establish a scientifically based academic discipline, a line of creative thinkers, including Herbert Spencer , Benjamin Kidd, Lewis H. Morgan , E.B. Tylor , and L.T. Hobhouse , developed analogies between human society and the biological organism. They introduced into sociological theory such biological concepts as variance, natural selection , and inheritance—asserting that these evolutionary factors resulted in the progress of societies from stages of savagery and barbarism to civilization by virtue of the survival of the fittest . Some writers believed that these stages of society could be seen in the developmental stages of each individual. Strange customs were explained by assuming that they were throwbacks to useful practices of an earlier period, such as the make-believe struggle sometimes enacted between the bridegroom and the bride’s relatives reflecting the earlier custom of bride capture.
In its popular period of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, social Darwinism , along with the doctrines of Adam Smith and Thomas Malthus , touted unrestricted competition and laissez-faire so that the “fittest” would survive and civilization would continue to advance. Although the popularity of social Darwinism waned in the 20th century, the ideas on competition and analogies from biological ecology were appropriated by the Chicago School of sociology (a University of Chicago program focusing on urban studies, founded by Albion Small in 1892) to form the theory of human ecology that endures as a viable study approach.
PMLA is the journal of the Modern Language Association of America. Since 1884, PMLA has published members' essays judged to be of interest to scholars and teachers of language and literature. Four issues each year (January, March, May, and October) contain essays on language and literature; a Directory issue (September) lists all members and the names and addresses of department and program administrators; and the November issue presents the program for the association's annual convention. Each issue of PMLA is mailed to over 29,000 MLA members and to 2,900 libraries worldwide.
Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions PMLA © 1995 Cambridge University Press Request Permissions
Literature Review: Outline, Strategies, and Examples [2023]
![historical sociology literature review Literature Review: Outline, Strategies, and Examples [2023]](https://studycorgi.com/wp-content/themes/studycorgi/images/e.png)
Writing a literature review might be easier than you think. You should understand its basic rules, and that’s it! This article is just about that.
Why is the literature review important? What are its types? We will uncover these and other possible questions.
Whether you are an experienced researcher or a student, this article will come in handy. Keep reading!
What Is a Literature Review?
- Step-by-Step Strategy
Let’s start with the literature review definition.
Literature review outlooks the existing sources on a given topic. Its primary goal is to provide an overall picture of the study object. It clears up the context and showcases the analysis of the paper’s theoretical methodology.
In case you want to see the examples of this type of work, check out our collection of free student essays .
Importance of Literature Review
In most cases, you need to write a literature review as a part of an academic project. Those can be dissertations, theses, or research papers.
Why is it important?
Imagine your final research as a 100% bar. Let’s recall Pareto law: 20% of efforts make 80% of the result. In our case, 20% is preparing a literature review. Writing itself is less important than an in-depth analysis of current literature. Do you want to avoid possible frustration in academic writing? Make a confident start with a literature review.
Sure, it’s impossible to find a topic that hasn’t been discussed or cited. That is why we cannot but use the works of other authors. You don’t have to agree with them. Discuss, criticize, analyze, and debate.
So, the purpose of the literature review is to give the knowledge foundation for the topic and establish its understanding. Abstracting from personal opinions and judgments is a crucial attribute.

Types of Literature Review
You can reach the purpose we have discussed above in several ways, which means there are several types of literature review.
What sets them apart?
In short, it’s their research methods and structure. Let’s break down each type:
- Meta-analysis implies the deductive approach. At first, you gather several related research papers. Then, you carry out its statistical analysis. As a result, you answer a formulated question.
- Meta-synthesis goes along with the inductive approach. It bases qualitative data assessment.
- Theoretical literature review implies gathering theories. Those theories apply to studied ideas or concepts. Links between theories become more explicit and clear. Why is it useful? It confirms that the theoretical framework is valid. On top of that, it assists in new hypothesis-making.
- Argumentative literature review starts with a problem statement. Then, you select and study the topic-related literature to confirm or deny the stated question. There is one sufficient problem in this type, by the way. The author may write the text with a grain of bias.
- Narrative literature review focuses on literature mismatches. It indicates possible gaps and concludes the body of literature. The primary step here is stating a focused research question. Another name for this type — a traditional literature review.
- Integrative literature review drives scientific novelty. It generates new statements around the existing research. The primary tool for that is secondary data. The thing you need is to review and criticize it. When is the best option to write an integrative literature review? It’s when you lack primary data analysis.
Remember: before writing a literature review, specify its type . Another step you should take is to argue your choice. Make sure it fits the research framework. It will save your time as you won’t need to figure out fitting strategies and methods.
Annotated Bibliography vs. Literature Review
Some would ask: isn’t what you are writing about is just an annotated bibliography ? Sure, both annotated bibliography and literature review list the research topic-related sources. But no more than that. Such contextual attributes as goal, structure, and components differ a lot.
For a more visual illustration of its difference, we made a table:
To sum up: an annotated bibliography is more referral. It does not require reading all the sources in the list. On the contrary, you won’t reach the literature review purpose without examining all the sources cited.

Literature Review: Step-by-Step Strategy
Now it’s time for a step-by-step guide. We are getting closer to a perfect literature review!
✔️ Step 1. Select the Topic
Selecting a topic requires looking from two perspectives. They are the following:
- Stand-alone paper . Choose an engaging topic and state a central problem. Then, investigate the trusted literature sources in scholarly databases.
- Part of a dissertation or thesis . In this case, you should dig around the thesis topic, research objectives, and purpose.
Regardless of the situation, you should not just list several literature items. On the contrary, build a decent logical connection and analysis. Only that way, you’ll answer the research question .
✔️ Step 2. Identify the Review Scope
One more essential thing to do is to define the research boundaries: don’t make them too broad or too narrow.
Push back on the chosen topic and define the number and level of comprehensiveness of your paper. Define the historical period as well. After that, select a pool of credible sources for further synthesis and analysis.
✔️ Step 3. Work with Sources
Investigate each chosen source. Note each important insight you come across. Learn how to cite a literature review to avoid plagiarism.
✔️ Step 4. Write a Literature Review Outline
No matter what the writing purpose is: research, informative, promotional, etc. The power of your future text is in the proper planning. If you start with a well-defined structure, there’s a much higher chance that you’ll reach exceptional results.
✔️ Step 5. Review the Literature
Once you’ve outlined your literature review, you’re ready for a writing part. While writing, try to be selective, thinking critically, and don’t forget to stay to the point. In the end, make a compelling literature review conclusion.
On top of the above five steps, explore some other working tips to make your literature review as informative as possible.

Literature Review Outline
We’ve already discussed the importance of a literature review outline. Now, it’s time to understand how to create it.
An outline for literature review has a bit different structure comparing with other types of paper works. It includes:
- Selected topic
- Research question
- Related research question trends and prospects
- Research methods
- Expected research results
- Overview of literature core areas
- Research problem consideration through the prism of this piece of literature
- Methods, controversial points, gaps
- Cumulative list of arguments around the research question
- Links to existing literature and a place of your paper in the existing system of knowledge.
It can be a plus if you clarify the applicability of your literature review in further research.
Once you outline your literature review, you can slightly shorten your writing path. Let’s move on to actual samples of literature review.
Literature Review Examples
How does a well-prepared literature review look like? Check these three StudyCorgi samples to understand. Follow the table:
Take your time and read literature review examples to solidify knowledge and sharpen your skills. You’ll get a more definite picture of the literature review length, methods, and topics.
Do you still have any questions? Don’t hesitate to contact us! Our writing experts are ready to help you with your paper on time.
❓ What Is the Purpose of a Literature Review?
Literature review solves several problems at once. Its purpose is to identify and gather the top insights, gaps, and answers to research questions. Those help to get a general idea of the degree of topic exploration. As a result, it forms a basis for further research. Or vice versa: it reveals a lack of need for additional studies.
❓ How Do You Structure a Literature Review?
Like any other academic paper, a literature review consists of three parts: introduction, main body, and the conclusion. Each of them needs full disclosure and logical interconnection
The introduction contains the topic overview, its problematics, research methods, and other general attributes of academic papers.
The body reveals how each of the selected literature sources answers the formulated questions from the introduction.
The conclusion summarizes the key findings from the body, connects the research to existing studies, and outlines the need for further investigation.
To ensure the success of your analysis, you should equally uphold all of these parts.
❓ What Must a Literature Review Include?
A basic literature review includes the introduction with the research topic definition, its arguments, and problems. Then, it has a synthesis of the picked pieces of literature. It may describe the possible gaps and contradictions in existing research. The practical relevance and contribution to new studies are also welcome.
❓ What Are the 5 C's of Writing a Literature Review?
Don’t forget about these five C’s to make things easier in writing a literature review:
Cite. Make a list of references for research you’ve used and apply proper citation rules. Use Google Scholar for this.
Compare. Make a comparison of such literature attributes as theories, insights, trends, arguments, etc. It’s better to use tables or diagrams to make your content visual.
Contrast. Use listings to categorize particular approaches, themes, and so on.
Critique. Critical thinking is a must in any scientific research. Don’t take individual formulations as truth. Explore controversial points of view.
Connect. Find a place of your research between existing studies. Propose new possible areas to dig further.
❓ How Long Should a Literature Review Be?
In most cases, professors or educational establishment guidelines determine the length of a literature review. Study them and stick to their requirements, so you don’t get it wrong.
If there are no specific rules, make sure it is no more than 30% of the whole research paper.
If your literature review is not a part of the thesis and goes as a stand-alone paper — be concise but explore the research area in-depth.
- Literature Reviews – The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- What is a literature review? – The Royal Literary Fund
- Literature Review: Purpose of a Literature Review – University of South Carolina
- The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It – University of Toronto
- Steps for Conducting a Lit Review – Florida A&M University Libraries
- Types of Literature Review – Business Research Methodology
- How to Conduct a Literature Review: Types of Literature Reviews – University Libraries
- Annotated bibliography VS. Literature Review – UNT Dallas Learning Commons
- Literature Review: Conducting & Writing – University of West Florida
- Share to Facebook
- Share to Twitter
- Share to LinkedIn
You might also like
105 literature review topics + how-to guide [2023], study guide on the epic of gilgamesh, essay topics & sample, the necklace: summary, themes, and a short story analysis.
ALAN v26n1 - Roald Dahl and Sociology 101
Roald Dahl and Sociology 101 Sharon E. Royer Largely known as the author of James and the Giant Peach (1961) and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (1964), Roald Dahl is also the author of three full-length works for early adolescents. It is of this group of young people that Dahl once said, " 'If my books can help children become readers, then I feel I have accomplished something important' " ( West ). Dahl's books for adolescents have caught the attention of young people and adults alike. The view of society revealed through his books--his implied criticism of adults and his contempt for social institutions--has made his works popular with adolescents. This same view has brought mixed reactions from critics. The variety of audiences that Dahl successfully wrote for throughout his career demonstrates his ability to appeal to specific groups of readers. Ironically, Roald Dahl wrote extensively for adults and children before he attempted to write books for young adults. His writing career began when Cecil Scott Forester interviewed him for the Saturday Evening Post and submitted Dahl's fictionalized account of his adventures in the Royal Air Force to the newspaper ( Pendergast ). In 1943, Dahl wrote his first children's story, The Gremlins, for Walt Disney, who wanted to make it into a film. Although it was never produced, Disney later published the story, complete with Disney's illustrations ( West ). After The Gremlins, Dahl left the field of children's literature and began writing short stories for adults. Although they were "generally macabre in nature, his stories won praise for their vivid details, carefully constructed plots, and surprise endings" ( West ). However, when he began to have difficulty coming up with new plots, Dahl decided to return to writing children's books. His first novel was James and the Giant Peach (1961), and his last was The Vicar of Nibbleswicke, published posthumously in 1991 ( Bulaong ). Dahl emphasized the importance of children's authors having experience with children when he noted, "Had I not had children of my own, I would have never written books for children, nor would I have been capable of doing so" ( Howard ). Dahl's first attempt at the young adult market was in 1977, with a collection of two autobiographical pieces, one essay, and four short stories, entitled The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar and Six Others. This work was viewed by critics as more appropriate for adults, because only two stories had young characters; therefore, the book was not especially successful ( West ). Five years later, however, Dahl published the enormously popular The BFG . Three Novels that Appeal to Young Teens Dahl's three major works for intermediate readers, The BFG (1982), The Witches (1983), and Matilda (1988) have relatively young protagonists, although the books are written at middle school/junior high reading levels. These books are able to speak to young adolescent readers because the protagonists, in spite of their ages, are at stages in their psychosocial development similar to the readers. Erik Erikson, who studied under Sigmund Freud, said that young people between the ages of 12 to 18 experience the psychosocial crisis of "identity versus role confusion" ( Slavin ). During this stage, the task of adolescents is to establish themselves as independent and self-reliant individuals ( Slavin ). This is especially significant for early adolescents because studies show that students' self-esteem is lowest when they are entering middle school/junior high school ( Slavin ). Each of the protagonists in Dahl's books for intermediate readers illustrates the capacity of young people to accomplish great things, and to exhibit an independent spirit. The main character in The BFG is Sophie, an eight-year old orphan who is kidnapped by the Big Friendly Giant, or the BFG for short, after she sees him blowing dreams into people's windows. Fortunately for Sophie, the BFG is not interested in eating humans, as are the other nine inhabitants of Giant Country. Outraged by the other giants' disgusting eating habits, Sophie and the BFG develop a plot, which involves the heads of the Army and Air Force as well as the Queen of England, to stop the giants from eating children around the world. In Dahl's second work, The Witches, the main character is seven years old. His Norwegian grandmother, a retired witchophile, becomes his guardian upon the death of his parents. A short time later, when the two are vacationing in Bournemouth, England, the boy accidentally observes the Annual Meeting of the witches in England, and is turned into a mouse by The Grand High Witch. He manages to escape, and enlists the help of his indomitable grandmother to stop the witches' evil plot to kill all of the children in England in a very creative manner. The title character in Matilda is a five-year-old child genius whose corrupt parents are practically oblivious to her existence. When she begins to attend school she encounters Miss Honey, her quiet and lovable teacher. She also meets Miss Trunchbull, the headmistress, an ex-Olympic hammer thrower who continues to practice with children. "The Trunchbull" refuses to acknowledge Matilda's genius and promote her, but Matilda finds that she can channel her brainpower to manipulate objects. She then develops a plan to use her power to get rid of Miss Trunchbull for good, and to rectify the wrongs done to Miss Honey. These three books, with their young heroes and heroines, are major contributions to the young adult market, due to the high level of commonality that Roald Dahl's protagonists share with the readers. Dahl's View of the World- and Its Place in his Books Several occurrences in Dahl's life can be connected to emerging values seen in his literature for adolescents. From very early in life, he was isolated from society because his mother, who was Norwegian, did not feel comfortable in English society after the death of his father ( West ). He grew up hearing Norwegian myths and taking annual vacations to Norway, a setting which is significantly reflected in The Witches ( Howard ). Dahl's mother honored his father's wishes and sent their children to English schools, despite the fact that at that time English schools stressed corporal punishment, of which Dahl's mother did not approve ( West ). Consequently, Dahl was removed from preparatory school when he was severely beaten with a cane after he played a prank ( West ). Dahl remembered those times as "days of horrors, of fierce discipline, of not talking in the dormitories, no running in the corridors, no untidiness of any sort, no this or that or the other, just rules, rules and still more rules that had to be obeyed. And the fear of the dreaded cane hung over us like the fear of death all the time" ( Pendergast ). Later, Dahl attended Repton, a prestigious English private school, where the headmaster was a clergyman who flogged students without mercy ( West ). Such schools would later be reflected in Matilda through Miss Trunchbull, who is known for her capability to throw students great distances for offenses such as eating liquorice during scripture lessons ( Matilda ). The author of an unauthorized biography on Dahl comments further on the effect that Dahl's life had on his writings: "Dahl's moral universe was one in which there could be no question without an answer, no battle without victory, no irresoluble complexity. This was true of his writing, also" ( Treglown ). Hence, the sum of these experiences developed in Dahl the cynical view of society that is conveyed in his literature. Although most of Dahl's contemporary readers have not had the experiences that Dahl did, through his writing he establishes a common bond with all young people who have been oppressed or unfairly disciplined. This bond is developed as a result of Dahl's societal view, characterized by the belief that authorities and social institutions, such as government and schools, should not be trusted or accepted. Mark West, after spending a great deal of time interviewing Dahl and researching his works, concludes, "In almost all of Dahl's fiction--whether it be intended for children or for adults--authoritarian figures, social institutions, and societal norms are ridiculed or at least undermined" (x). Even the heads of the armed forces do not escape Dahl's scorn of social institutions. This attitude is seen in The BFG when the Head of the Air Force and the Head of the Army are unable to devise a plan to capture the child-eating giants. Consequently, the BFG states that they become "biffsquiggled" at any small obstacle, and the Queen calls them "rather dim-witted characters". By displaying and ridiculing their incompetence, Dahl communicates the message that heads of social institutions can not be trusted to act intelligently. Adults, representations of authority to young people, are also dealt with harshly in Dahl's books if they dare to cause trouble for his young heroes or heroines. This treatment can be seen when Miss Trunchbull, the dictatorial headmistress of Matilda's school, becomes the target of Matilda's telepathic powers, and soon after vanishes. This instance, and many others like it, reflect Dahl's attitude that "beastly people must be punished" (in Pendergast ). The introduction to the Children's Literature Review (1997) entry on Dahl explains, "The morality of his writings is simple, usually a matter of absolute good versus consummate evil--with no shades of gray--and those who fall into the latter category are sure to meet with a swift and horrible end". The exception to Dahl's portrayal of adult authority figures is "his tendency to see the family as a possible source of happiness and comfort" ( West ). In Dahl's books, with the exception of Matilda, family members are willing to support one another, even against the rest of the world. This is evident in the relationship between the main character and his grandmother in The Witches. For example, after the protagonist has been turned into a mouse and shares his plan to eliminate all the witches in England with his grandmother, her immediate reaction is, "We shall check it out immediately!. . .There's not a second to waste!". Therefore, not all adults are portrayed negatively, but any that abuse their authority over young people are severely punished. All of these factors that contribute to Dahl's implied criticism of society have generated contradictory responses. Dahl's Positive Impact on Adolescent Readers Many people believe that Roald Dahl's sociology may have a positive effect on readers. His view of society appeals to adolescents because it closely reflects their own perspective. First, as one critic suggests, he appeals to their "gut-punching and slapstick sense of humor" as well as their "crude sense of fun and delight in jokey phrases" ( Elkin ). Second, young adults often experience feelings of rebellion against the adults trying to socialize them, which is reflected by Dahl's overwhelmingly negative portrayal of adults ( Telgen ). The tendency of adolescents to increasingly turn away from parents and reject the authority of adults while they seek to establish unique identities is cited by Erik Erikson as characteristic of the social development of adolescents ( Slavin ). Another component of Dahl's philosophy that appeals to early adolescents is the belief that good triumphs, and evil is punished or destroyed. For example, when the child-eating giants are captured in The BFG, they are thrown into a pit where they are imprisoned for life, without attempts to befriend them or draft them for some useful purpose ( Rees ). Belief in the destruction or punishment of evil leads to a fourth aspect of Dahl's sociology that appeals to young people: the presence of physical violence as a means of retribution. Julia Marriage, a reviewer for The School Librarian, notes that while the violence might concern adults, "children are likely to take this in their stride, however regrettable that may be" ( Telgen ). These elements in Dahl's books reflect many adolescents' perspectives and provide an incentive for young people to read. Another positive feature of Dahl's works is that they encourage young people through positive presentations of their peers at a time when many are struggling with low self-esteem and looking to peers for their identity. Literary critic Linda Taylor notes that Dahl's main characters are known for their "wit, solitariness, independence, tenacity, intelligence and resourcefulness". This is especially significant for young women, because Dahl's female protagonists, like Matilda and Sophie, are independent and are not intimidated by authority figures ( West ). For example, Matilda does not allow herself to become a helpless victim by refusing to let her poor home life deny her a sense of self-worth ( West ). When her parents refuse to buy her books, she finds the public library on her own--at the age of four ( Matilda ). This independence, characteristic of all Dahl's main characters, allows them to exact revenge against their oppressors ( Telgen ). Matilda's revenge comes when her parents are going to force her to leave the country with them, but she manages to stay behind with her beloved teacher. However, Dahl also offers the encouragement that these young heroes and heroines--independent and resourceful though they may be--are able to find comfort and support from older allies ( West ). This is certainly the case in The Witches, when the main character, thinking about his grandmother, comments, "It doesn't matter who you are or what you look like so long as somebody loves you". The results of these positive elements in Dahl's works are books that appeal to and offer encouragement to young adults. Yet, these positive effects are viewed by some to be overshadowed by the possible negative effects of Dahl's view of society on adolescents. Critics' Objections to Dahl's Books Many challengers of Dahl's work object to his unrealistic portrayal of life. For example, David Rees , in an article published in Children's Literature in Education (1988), states, "The trouble with Dahl's world is that it is black and white--two-dimensional and unreal". Dahl's portrayal of life can be seen as a result of his overall philosophy of society. Since adults are not to be trusted, they are often portrayed as villains. Yet, Rees explains, "adults enter a child's world in a thousand different moral shapes and sizes". Very rarely does the average child encounter, as Sophie did, adults as evil as the flesh-eating giants, as incompetent as the heads of the armed forces, or as childlike as the BFG. There is much more variety--and many fewer extremes--in the types of adults that children may encounter. Another unrealistic aspect of Dahl's work is the concept that virtue and poverty go together, such as with Miss Honey, Matilda's adored teacher ( Telgen ). Some find this connection objectionable because it is a view consistent with Marxist philosophy, not one that supports free market capitalism. Adult readers also object to the unreality of Dahl's books because in life, everything is not fair, and good does not always win. Even when the hero of The Witches is permanently turned into a mouse, the reader is assured by the main character that, "I honestly don't feel especially bad about it. I don't even feel angry. In fact, I feel rather good" ( The Witches ). This lack of regret is the norm in Dahl's works instead of the exception, as some feel that it ought to be. Dahl has garnered further criticism for his portrayal of adults, which many challengers believe has a negative effect on his young readership. Throughout his work, authoritarian adults are frequently the victims of vicious revenge. However, what some find most objectionable is that adults are treated harshly even when they are innocent, such as when the main character's parents are killed in a car crash in The Witches ( Pendergast ). Critics Myra Pollack Sadker and David Miller Sadker have accused Dahl of ageism, and of conveying the message that "the needs and desires and opinions of old people are totally irrelevant and inconsequential". Some believe that presenting adolescents with such a view of adults, at an age when they are experiencing conflicting emotions about adults already, could adversely affect their relationships with older people. Commenting on this attitude, Bruno Bettelheim, author of The Uses of Enchantment , points out its limitations: There is a widespread refusal to let children know that the source of much that goes wrong in life is due to our very own nature--the propensity of all men for acting aggressively, asocially, selfishly, out of anger and anxiety. Instead, we want our children to believe that, inherently, all men are good. But children know that they are not always good; and often, even when they are, they would prefer not to be (in Hitchens ). It is this inclination to pretend that all people are good that Dahl challenges, and consequently his literature attracts opposition from many adult sources. The final major concern of critics of Dahl's works is his treatment of important issues, and how that treatment might affect his readers. This concern is especially relevant when considering The Witches, ninth on the list of the most frequently banned books in the 1990s ( Foerstel ). Dahl has been accused of sexism by feminists in England, and has been criticized for his negative portrayal of witches by witches' societies in the United States. These critics point to statements such as the following in making their case against Dahl: "But the fact remains that all witches are women. There is no such thing as a male witch" ( Telgen ; The Witches ). However, his critics often ignore the statement that follows the first: "On the other hand, a ghoul is always a male" ( The Witches ). When questioned about this issue, Dahl defended his work by pointing to the " 'lovely grandmother, who is one of the major characters in the story' " ( Telgen ). The grandmother's character is communicated to the reader early in the book when the main character says, " 'The fact that I am still here and able to speak to you. . .is due entirely to my wonderful grandmother' " ( The Witches ). Dahl claims that the previous accusations are unfounded because of the courage and wisdom that the grandmother displays, in addition to her encouragement of unorthodoxy ( Treglown ). He does not concern himself with the possibility that certain groups of adults might be offended, but concentrates on entertaining his readers. Dahl's treatment of the issue of child neglect has also been criticized. This view is based on the fact that Matilda is treated by her parents, at least from her perspective, "as nothing more than a scab. A scab is something you have to put up with until the time comes when you can pick it off and flick it away" ( Matilda ). One reviewer, Anna A. Flowers, concluded, "Child neglect countered by revenge, however funny and however justified, is just not a nice theme" (in Telgen ). However, Matilda could also be used as an avenue for discussion with students about child abuse and neglect. Nevertheless, because it leads to an unrealistic portrayal of life, a negative representation of adults, and a careless treatment of social issues, Dahl's sociology is viewed by many to be more harmful than beneficial to adolescents. Yet, as is often the case, controversy may lead directly to popularity. The very controversy caused by Roald Dahl's works for early adolescents has drawn millions of teens to his books and, subsequently, encouraged them to enjoy reading. These young people found in Roald Dahl something that they could not find anywhere else: an author with a view of society that was essentially identical to their own--distrustful of authority figures and firm in the belief that good will triumph. Concerning Dahl's popularity, the librarian of one middle school made this comment during the spring of 1997: "Roald Dahl's books are always on our reorder list, for copies of his books circulate so much they are worn in no time! The titles are always checked out and usually on reserve!" ( Crawford ). Roald Dahl's view of society, his contempt for corrupt authority figures, and his distrust of the system have made his works popular with adolescents. An expression of such values in the disguise of fantasy and humor is a rare find and one that young adolescents should be encouraged to make. Roald Dahl has certainly achieved his goal as an author because his books have provided a way for many young people to become readers. Sharon Royer is a senior, majoring in education, at Malone College (Canton, Ohio) and is indebted to Dr. Virginia Carroll of Kent State-Stark Campus for her to submit this article for publication. This is Ms. Royer's first publication in The ALAN Review. Works Cited Bulaong, Lia. The Roald Dahl Index 1996. [Online] Available http://www.tridel.com.ph/user/bula/rdahl.htm (not currently available), January 27, 1997. Dahl, Roald. The BFG. New York: Puffin Books, 1982. Dahl, Roald. Matilda. New York: Puffin Books, 1988. ---. The Witches. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1983. Crawford, Paula J. Letter from Jackson Memorial Middle School librarian to student (Massillon, Ohio). 26 March 1997. Elkin, Judith. "The BFG [book review]." The Times Literary Supplement 26 Nov. 1982: 1303. Foerstel, Herbert N. "The Most Frequently Banned Books in the 1990s." Banned in the U.S.A.: A Reference Guide to Book Censorship in Schools and Public Libraries. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1994. [Online] Available http://www.cs.cmu.edu/People/spok/most-banned.html , January 27, 1997. Hitchens, Christopher. "The Grimmest Tales." Vanity Fair Jan. 1994. Howard, Kristy. The Roald Dahl Home Page 1996. [Online] Available http://www.roalddahl.org/ , January 27, 1997. Pendergast, Tom. "Dahl, Roald." Contemporary Authors New Revision Series. Vol. 37. Ed. James G. Lesniak. Detroit: Gale Research, 1992. Rees, David. "Dahl's Chickens: Roald Dahl." Children's Literature in Education, Fall 1988. Slavin, Robert E. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1997. Telgen, Diane. (Ed). "Roald Dahl." Children's Literature Review. New York: Gale, 1997. Treglown, Jeremy. Roald Dahl: A Biography. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1994. West, Mark I. Roald Dahl. Twayne's English authors Series 492. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1992. Sharon Royer lives in North Canton, Ohio, where she is a student and prospective who enjoys studying young adult literature. Reference Citation: Royer, Sharon. (1998). "Roald Dahl." The ALAN Review, Volume 26, Number 1.

IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
An evaluation rubric is presented that facilitates a progressive appraisal of the integration of history within a literature review. Ultimately, the article serves to stimulate the processes of thought, interpretation and rationalization when historically engaging with a body of literature.
Doing a Literature Review in Sociology Advice from a sociologist and a librarian about how to do a literature review. Introduction A literature review helps you figure out what scholars, what studies, and what questions your project is in conversation with.
Writing Guidelines: Start with Writing for Sociology from the UC Berkeley Sociology Department—it's packed with great content! A great overview of the entire process from the Writing Center at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. A piece from the blog Everyday Sociology on " How (and Why) to Write a Literature Review ".
A literature review provides an overview of previous research on a topic that critically evaluates, classifies, and compares what has already been published on a particular topic. It allows the author to synthesize and place into context the research and scholarly literature relevant to the topic.
A literature review is not a descriptive annotated bibliography. All works included in the review must be read, evaluated, and analyzed, and synthesized, meaning that relationships between the works must also be discussed. VCU Libraries Guide: How to Write a Literature Review Using a Synthesis Matrix
A way to give historical perspective on an issue and show how other researchers have addressed a problem An analysis of sources based on your own perspective on the topic Based on the most pertinent and significant research conducted in the field, both new and old A literature review is NOT:
The history of sociology is both a traditional area of sociology itself and a part of the history of the social sciences as studied by intellectual historians and historians of science. The earliest writings on the subject were completed by sociologists attempting to construct a canon and a history of the discipline reaching into the distant ...
Sociology Literature Reviews Samples For Students 612 samples of this type Regardless of how high you rate your writing skills, it's always a worthy idea to check out an expertly written Literature Review example, especially when you're dealing with a sophisticated Sociology topic.
Literature review There is ample evidence for enduring, widely held misperceptions in the US (Kuklinski et al. 2000; Lazer et al. 2018; Jerit and Zhao 2020). Misperceptions persist across several domains, including policy (Jerit and Barabas 2012), the evaluation of politicians (Nyhan and Reifler 2010; Miller et al. 2016),...
When you work on a historical literature review sociology, make sure to consider the following aspects: Focus on a specific period and make sure you can provide justification as to why you have chosen to focus on a specific point.
The last decade featured the emergence of a significant and growing literature concerning comparative-historical methods. This literature offers methodological tools for causal and descriptive inference that go beyond the techniques currently available in mainstream statistical analysis. In terms of causal inference, new procedures exist for testing hypotheses about necessary and sufficient ...
The literature review is a critical look at the existing research that is significant to the work that you are carrying out. This overview identifies prominent research trends in addition to assessing the overall strengths and weaknesses of the existing research. Purpose of the Literature Review
A literature review is an account of the scholarly works published on a topic. It is different from an annotated bibliography - and far more interesting at that. Instead of being just a list of summaries, a literature review synthesizes the information from all available sources in an overall relationship to your guiding concept.
The Sociological Review 2.743 5-Year Impact Factor: 3.630 JOURNAL HOMEPAGE SUBMIT PAPER The Sociological Review is one of the world's foremost journals for sociological inquiry in all traditions, with over 100 years of publishing high quality and innovative articles.
In recent years, a new branch of sociology came into existence called the sociology of literature.As it is concerned with the domain of literary study, the sociology of literature...
AIMS AND SCOPE OF JOURNAL: The Annual Review of Sociology, in publication since 1975, covers the significant developments in the field of sociology. Topics covered in the journal include major theoretical and methodological developments as well as current research in the major subfields.
sociology, a social science that studies human societies, their interactions, and the processes that preserve and change them. It does this by examining the dynamics of constituent parts of societies such as institutions, communities, populations, and gender, racial, or age groups.
bining history, literature, sociology, art history, and psychology. Lanson's major works in-clude Hommes et livres (1892), Histoire de la litterature francaise (1894), L'art de la ... of literary history to sociology, it is not because I believe I am well versed on that topic; on the con-trary, it appealed to me because it was new to me, ...
Nursing. In this nursing literature review example, the author notes the complexity and intricacy of managing chronic pain. The paper enumerates the current studies on the topic, its advantages, and disadvantages. In the synthesis, the author proposes a new and improved framework for chronic pain management. 3.
Sociology Lens builds upon the legacy of Journal of Historical Sociology, founded on the ideas of Philip Abrams and the conviction that historical and social studies ultimately have a common subject matter and can only benefit from the interchange of ideas and perspectives.
Roald Dahl and Sociology 101 Sharon E. Royer Largely known as the author of James and the Giant Peach (1961) and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (1964), Roald Dahl is also the author of three full-length works for early adolescents. ... The introduction to the Children's Literature Review (1997) entry on Dahl explains, ...