An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- BMC Med Res Methodol
The case study approach
Sarah crowe.
1 Division of Primary Care, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Kathrin Cresswell
2 Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Ann Robertson
3 School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Anthony Avery
Aziz sheikh.
The case study approach allows in-depth, multi-faceted explorations of complex issues in their real-life settings. The value of the case study approach is well recognised in the fields of business, law and policy, but somewhat less so in health services research. Based on our experiences of conducting several health-related case studies, we reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the particular advantages and disadvantages of employing this methodological approach. The paper concludes with key pointers to aid those designing and appraising proposals for conducting case study research, and a checklist to help readers assess the quality of case study reports.
Introduction
The case study approach is particularly useful to employ when there is a need to obtain an in-depth appreciation of an issue, event or phenomenon of interest, in its natural real-life context. Our aim in writing this piece is to provide insights into when to consider employing this approach and an overview of key methodological considerations in relation to the design, planning, analysis, interpretation and reporting of case studies.
The illustrative 'grand round', 'case report' and 'case series' have a long tradition in clinical practice and research. Presenting detailed critiques, typically of one or more patients, aims to provide insights into aspects of the clinical case and, in doing so, illustrate broader lessons that may be learnt. In research, the conceptually-related case study approach can be used, for example, to describe in detail a patient's episode of care, explore professional attitudes to and experiences of a new policy initiative or service development or more generally to 'investigate contemporary phenomena within its real-life context' [ 1 ]. Based on our experiences of conducting a range of case studies, we reflect on when to consider using this approach, discuss the key steps involved and illustrate, with examples, some of the practical challenges of attaining an in-depth understanding of a 'case' as an integrated whole. In keeping with previously published work, we acknowledge the importance of theory to underpin the design, selection, conduct and interpretation of case studies[ 2 ]. In so doing, we make passing reference to the different epistemological approaches used in case study research by key theoreticians and methodologists in this field of enquiry.
This paper is structured around the following main questions: What is a case study? What are case studies used for? How are case studies conducted? What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided? We draw in particular on four of our own recently published examples of case studies (see Tables Tables1, 1 , ,2, 2 , ,3 3 and and4) 4 ) and those of others to illustrate our discussion[ 3 - 7 ].
Example of a case study investigating the reasons for differences in recruitment rates of minority ethnic people in asthma research[ 3 ]
Example of a case study investigating the process of planning and implementing a service in Primary Care Organisations[ 4 ]
Example of a case study investigating the introduction of the electronic health records[ 5 ]
Example of a case study investigating the formal and informal ways students learn about patient safety[ 6 ]
What is a case study?
A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life context. It is an established research design that is used extensively in a wide variety of disciplines, particularly in the social sciences. A case study can be defined in a variety of ways (Table (Table5), 5 ), the central tenet being the need to explore an event or phenomenon in depth and in its natural context. It is for this reason sometimes referred to as a "naturalistic" design; this is in contrast to an "experimental" design (such as a randomised controlled trial) in which the investigator seeks to exert control over and manipulate the variable(s) of interest.
Definitions of a case study
Stake's work has been particularly influential in defining the case study approach to scientific enquiry. He has helpfully characterised three main types of case study: intrinsic , instrumental and collective [ 8 ]. An intrinsic case study is typically undertaken to learn about a unique phenomenon. The researcher should define the uniqueness of the phenomenon, which distinguishes it from all others. In contrast, the instrumental case study uses a particular case (some of which may be better than others) to gain a broader appreciation of an issue or phenomenon. The collective case study involves studying multiple cases simultaneously or sequentially in an attempt to generate a still broader appreciation of a particular issue.
These are however not necessarily mutually exclusive categories. In the first of our examples (Table (Table1), 1 ), we undertook an intrinsic case study to investigate the issue of recruitment of minority ethnic people into the specific context of asthma research studies, but it developed into a instrumental case study through seeking to understand the issue of recruitment of these marginalised populations more generally, generating a number of the findings that are potentially transferable to other disease contexts[ 3 ]. In contrast, the other three examples (see Tables Tables2, 2 , ,3 3 and and4) 4 ) employed collective case study designs to study the introduction of workforce reconfiguration in primary care, the implementation of electronic health records into hospitals, and to understand the ways in which healthcare students learn about patient safety considerations[ 4 - 6 ]. Although our study focusing on the introduction of General Practitioners with Specialist Interests (Table (Table2) 2 ) was explicitly collective in design (four contrasting primary care organisations were studied), is was also instrumental in that this particular professional group was studied as an exemplar of the more general phenomenon of workforce redesign[ 4 ].
What are case studies used for?
According to Yin, case studies can be used to explain, describe or explore events or phenomena in the everyday contexts in which they occur[ 1 ]. These can, for example, help to understand and explain causal links and pathways resulting from a new policy initiative or service development (see Tables Tables2 2 and and3, 3 , for example)[ 1 ]. In contrast to experimental designs, which seek to test a specific hypothesis through deliberately manipulating the environment (like, for example, in a randomised controlled trial giving a new drug to randomly selected individuals and then comparing outcomes with controls),[ 9 ] the case study approach lends itself well to capturing information on more explanatory ' how ', 'what' and ' why ' questions, such as ' how is the intervention being implemented and received on the ground?'. The case study approach can offer additional insights into what gaps exist in its delivery or why one implementation strategy might be chosen over another. This in turn can help develop or refine theory, as shown in our study of the teaching of patient safety in undergraduate curricula (Table (Table4 4 )[ 6 , 10 ]. Key questions to consider when selecting the most appropriate study design are whether it is desirable or indeed possible to undertake a formal experimental investigation in which individuals and/or organisations are allocated to an intervention or control arm? Or whether the wish is to obtain a more naturalistic understanding of an issue? The former is ideally studied using a controlled experimental design, whereas the latter is more appropriately studied using a case study design.
Case studies may be approached in different ways depending on the epistemological standpoint of the researcher, that is, whether they take a critical (questioning one's own and others' assumptions), interpretivist (trying to understand individual and shared social meanings) or positivist approach (orientating towards the criteria of natural sciences, such as focusing on generalisability considerations) (Table (Table6). 6 ). Whilst such a schema can be conceptually helpful, it may be appropriate to draw on more than one approach in any case study, particularly in the context of conducting health services research. Doolin has, for example, noted that in the context of undertaking interpretative case studies, researchers can usefully draw on a critical, reflective perspective which seeks to take into account the wider social and political environment that has shaped the case[ 11 ].
Example of epistemological approaches that may be used in case study research
How are case studies conducted?
Here, we focus on the main stages of research activity when planning and undertaking a case study; the crucial stages are: defining the case; selecting the case(s); collecting and analysing the data; interpreting data; and reporting the findings.
Defining the case
Carefully formulated research question(s), informed by the existing literature and a prior appreciation of the theoretical issues and setting(s), are all important in appropriately and succinctly defining the case[ 8 , 12 ]. Crucially, each case should have a pre-defined boundary which clarifies the nature and time period covered by the case study (i.e. its scope, beginning and end), the relevant social group, organisation or geographical area of interest to the investigator, the types of evidence to be collected, and the priorities for data collection and analysis (see Table Table7 7 )[ 1 ]. A theory driven approach to defining the case may help generate knowledge that is potentially transferable to a range of clinical contexts and behaviours; using theory is also likely to result in a more informed appreciation of, for example, how and why interventions have succeeded or failed[ 13 ].
Example of a checklist for rating a case study proposal[ 8 ]
For example, in our evaluation of the introduction of electronic health records in English hospitals (Table (Table3), 3 ), we defined our cases as the NHS Trusts that were receiving the new technology[ 5 ]. Our focus was on how the technology was being implemented. However, if the primary research interest had been on the social and organisational dimensions of implementation, we might have defined our case differently as a grouping of healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors and/or nurses). The precise beginning and end of the case may however prove difficult to define. Pursuing this same example, when does the process of implementation and adoption of an electronic health record system really begin or end? Such judgements will inevitably be influenced by a range of factors, including the research question, theory of interest, the scope and richness of the gathered data and the resources available to the research team.
Selecting the case(s)
The decision on how to select the case(s) to study is a very important one that merits some reflection. In an intrinsic case study, the case is selected on its own merits[ 8 ]. The case is selected not because it is representative of other cases, but because of its uniqueness, which is of genuine interest to the researchers. This was, for example, the case in our study of the recruitment of minority ethnic participants into asthma research (Table (Table1) 1 ) as our earlier work had demonstrated the marginalisation of minority ethnic people with asthma, despite evidence of disproportionate asthma morbidity[ 14 , 15 ]. In another example of an intrinsic case study, Hellstrom et al.[ 16 ] studied an elderly married couple living with dementia to explore how dementia had impacted on their understanding of home, their everyday life and their relationships.
For an instrumental case study, selecting a "typical" case can work well[ 8 ]. In contrast to the intrinsic case study, the particular case which is chosen is of less importance than selecting a case that allows the researcher to investigate an issue or phenomenon. For example, in order to gain an understanding of doctors' responses to health policy initiatives, Som undertook an instrumental case study interviewing clinicians who had a range of responsibilities for clinical governance in one NHS acute hospital trust[ 17 ]. Sampling a "deviant" or "atypical" case may however prove even more informative, potentially enabling the researcher to identify causal processes, generate hypotheses and develop theory.
In collective or multiple case studies, a number of cases are carefully selected. This offers the advantage of allowing comparisons to be made across several cases and/or replication. Choosing a "typical" case may enable the findings to be generalised to theory (i.e. analytical generalisation) or to test theory by replicating the findings in a second or even a third case (i.e. replication logic)[ 1 ]. Yin suggests two or three literal replications (i.e. predicting similar results) if the theory is straightforward and five or more if the theory is more subtle. However, critics might argue that selecting 'cases' in this way is insufficiently reflexive and ill-suited to the complexities of contemporary healthcare organisations.
The selected case study site(s) should allow the research team access to the group of individuals, the organisation, the processes or whatever else constitutes the chosen unit of analysis for the study. Access is therefore a central consideration; the researcher needs to come to know the case study site(s) well and to work cooperatively with them. Selected cases need to be not only interesting but also hospitable to the inquiry [ 8 ] if they are to be informative and answer the research question(s). Case study sites may also be pre-selected for the researcher, with decisions being influenced by key stakeholders. For example, our selection of case study sites in the evaluation of the implementation and adoption of electronic health record systems (see Table Table3) 3 ) was heavily influenced by NHS Connecting for Health, the government agency that was responsible for overseeing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT)[ 5 ]. This prominent stakeholder had already selected the NHS sites (through a competitive bidding process) to be early adopters of the electronic health record systems and had negotiated contracts that detailed the deployment timelines.
It is also important to consider in advance the likely burden and risks associated with participation for those who (or the site(s) which) comprise the case study. Of particular importance is the obligation for the researcher to think through the ethical implications of the study (e.g. the risk of inadvertently breaching anonymity or confidentiality) and to ensure that potential participants/participating sites are provided with sufficient information to make an informed choice about joining the study. The outcome of providing this information might be that the emotive burden associated with participation, or the organisational disruption associated with supporting the fieldwork, is considered so high that the individuals or sites decide against participation.
In our example of evaluating implementations of electronic health record systems, given the restricted number of early adopter sites available to us, we sought purposively to select a diverse range of implementation cases among those that were available[ 5 ]. We chose a mixture of teaching, non-teaching and Foundation Trust hospitals, and examples of each of the three electronic health record systems procured centrally by the NPfIT. At one recruited site, it quickly became apparent that access was problematic because of competing demands on that organisation. Recognising the importance of full access and co-operative working for generating rich data, the research team decided not to pursue work at that site and instead to focus on other recruited sites.
Collecting the data
In order to develop a thorough understanding of the case, the case study approach usually involves the collection of multiple sources of evidence, using a range of quantitative (e.g. questionnaires, audits and analysis of routinely collected healthcare data) and more commonly qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews, focus groups and observations). The use of multiple sources of data (data triangulation) has been advocated as a way of increasing the internal validity of a study (i.e. the extent to which the method is appropriate to answer the research question)[ 8 , 18 - 21 ]. An underlying assumption is that data collected in different ways should lead to similar conclusions, and approaching the same issue from different angles can help develop a holistic picture of the phenomenon (Table (Table2 2 )[ 4 ].
Brazier and colleagues used a mixed-methods case study approach to investigate the impact of a cancer care programme[ 22 ]. Here, quantitative measures were collected with questionnaires before, and five months after, the start of the intervention which did not yield any statistically significant results. Qualitative interviews with patients however helped provide an insight into potentially beneficial process-related aspects of the programme, such as greater, perceived patient involvement in care. The authors reported how this case study approach provided a number of contextual factors likely to influence the effectiveness of the intervention and which were not likely to have been obtained from quantitative methods alone.
In collective or multiple case studies, data collection needs to be flexible enough to allow a detailed description of each individual case to be developed (e.g. the nature of different cancer care programmes), before considering the emerging similarities and differences in cross-case comparisons (e.g. to explore why one programme is more effective than another). It is important that data sources from different cases are, where possible, broadly comparable for this purpose even though they may vary in nature and depth.
Analysing, interpreting and reporting case studies
Making sense and offering a coherent interpretation of the typically disparate sources of data (whether qualitative alone or together with quantitative) is far from straightforward. Repeated reviewing and sorting of the voluminous and detail-rich data are integral to the process of analysis. In collective case studies, it is helpful to analyse data relating to the individual component cases first, before making comparisons across cases. Attention needs to be paid to variations within each case and, where relevant, the relationship between different causes, effects and outcomes[ 23 ]. Data will need to be organised and coded to allow the key issues, both derived from the literature and emerging from the dataset, to be easily retrieved at a later stage. An initial coding frame can help capture these issues and can be applied systematically to the whole dataset with the aid of a qualitative data analysis software package.
The Framework approach is a practical approach, comprising of five stages (familiarisation; identifying a thematic framework; indexing; charting; mapping and interpretation) , to managing and analysing large datasets particularly if time is limited, as was the case in our study of recruitment of South Asians into asthma research (Table (Table1 1 )[ 3 , 24 ]. Theoretical frameworks may also play an important role in integrating different sources of data and examining emerging themes. For example, we drew on a socio-technical framework to help explain the connections between different elements - technology; people; and the organisational settings within which they worked - in our study of the introduction of electronic health record systems (Table (Table3 3 )[ 5 ]. Our study of patient safety in undergraduate curricula drew on an evaluation-based approach to design and analysis, which emphasised the importance of the academic, organisational and practice contexts through which students learn (Table (Table4 4 )[ 6 ].
Case study findings can have implications both for theory development and theory testing. They may establish, strengthen or weaken historical explanations of a case and, in certain circumstances, allow theoretical (as opposed to statistical) generalisation beyond the particular cases studied[ 12 ]. These theoretical lenses should not, however, constitute a strait-jacket and the cases should not be "forced to fit" the particular theoretical framework that is being employed.
When reporting findings, it is important to provide the reader with enough contextual information to understand the processes that were followed and how the conclusions were reached. In a collective case study, researchers may choose to present the findings from individual cases separately before amalgamating across cases. Care must be taken to ensure the anonymity of both case sites and individual participants (if agreed in advance) by allocating appropriate codes or withholding descriptors. In the example given in Table Table3, 3 , we decided against providing detailed information on the NHS sites and individual participants in order to avoid the risk of inadvertent disclosure of identities[ 5 , 25 ].
What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided?
The case study approach is, as with all research, not without its limitations. When investigating the formal and informal ways undergraduate students learn about patient safety (Table (Table4), 4 ), for example, we rapidly accumulated a large quantity of data. The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted on the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources. This highlights a more general point of the importance of avoiding the temptation to collect as much data as possible; adequate time also needs to be set aside for data analysis and interpretation of what are often highly complex datasets.
Case study research has sometimes been criticised for lacking scientific rigour and providing little basis for generalisation (i.e. producing findings that may be transferable to other settings)[ 1 ]. There are several ways to address these concerns, including: the use of theoretical sampling (i.e. drawing on a particular conceptual framework); respondent validation (i.e. participants checking emerging findings and the researcher's interpretation, and providing an opinion as to whether they feel these are accurate); and transparency throughout the research process (see Table Table8 8 )[ 8 , 18 - 21 , 23 , 26 ]. Transparency can be achieved by describing in detail the steps involved in case selection, data collection, the reasons for the particular methods chosen, and the researcher's background and level of involvement (i.e. being explicit about how the researcher has influenced data collection and interpretation). Seeking potential, alternative explanations, and being explicit about how interpretations and conclusions were reached, help readers to judge the trustworthiness of the case study report. Stake provides a critique checklist for a case study report (Table (Table9 9 )[ 8 ].
Potential pitfalls and mitigating actions when undertaking case study research
Stake's checklist for assessing the quality of a case study report[ 8 ]
Conclusions
The case study approach allows, amongst other things, critical events, interventions, policy developments and programme-based service reforms to be studied in detail in a real-life context. It should therefore be considered when an experimental design is either inappropriate to answer the research questions posed or impossible to undertake. Considering the frequency with which implementations of innovations are now taking place in healthcare settings and how well the case study approach lends itself to in-depth, complex health service research, we believe this approach should be more widely considered by researchers. Though inherently challenging, the research case study can, if carefully conceptualised and thoughtfully undertaken and reported, yield powerful insights into many important aspects of health and healthcare delivery.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
AS conceived this article. SC, KC and AR wrote this paper with GH, AA and AS all commenting on various drafts. SC and AS are guarantors.
Pre-publication history
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/100/prepub
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the participants and colleagues who contributed to the individual case studies that we have drawn on. This work received no direct funding, but it has been informed by projects funded by Asthma UK, the NHS Service Delivery Organisation, NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, and Patient Safety Research Portfolio. We would also like to thank the expert reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. Our thanks are also due to Dr. Allison Worth who commented on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
- Yin RK. Case study research, design and method. 4. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
- Keen J, Packwood T. Qualitative research; case study evaluation. BMJ. 1995; 311 :444–446. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Sheikh A, Halani L, Bhopal R, Netuveli G, Partridge M, Car J. et al. Facilitating the Recruitment of Minority Ethnic People into Research: Qualitative Case Study of South Asians and Asthma. PLoS Med. 2009; 6 (10):1–11. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Pinnock H, Huby G, Powell A, Kielmann T, Price D, Williams S, The process of planning, development and implementation of a General Practitioner with a Special Interest service in Primary Care Organisations in England and Wales: a comparative prospective case study. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO) 2008. http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/99-final-report.pdf
- Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T. et al. Prospective evaluation of the implementation and adoption of NHS Connecting for Health's national electronic health record in secondary care in England: interim findings. BMJ. 2010; 41 :c4564. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Pearson P, Steven A, Howe A, Sheikh A, Ashcroft D, Smith P. the Patient Safety Education Study Group. Learning about patient safety: organisational context and culture in the education of healthcare professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010; 15 :4–10. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009052. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- van Harten WH, Casparie TF, Fisscher OA. The evaluation of the introduction of a quality management system: a process-oriented case study in a large rehabilitation hospital. Health Policy. 2002; 60 (1):17–37. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00187-7. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Stake RE. The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
- Sheikh A, Smeeth L, Ashcroft R. Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52 (482):746–51. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- King G, Keohane R, Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
- Doolin B. Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology. 1998; 13 :301–311. doi: 10.1057/jit.1998.8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- George AL, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
- Eccles M. the Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG) Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science. 2006; 1 :1–8. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Netuveli G, Hurwitz B, Levy M, Fletcher M, Barnes G, Durham SR, Sheikh A. Ethnic variations in UK asthma frequency, morbidity, and health-service use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005; 365 (9456):312–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Sheikh A, Panesar SS, Lasserson T, Netuveli G. Recruitment of ethnic minorities to asthma studies. Thorax. 2004; 59 (7):634. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Hellström I, Nolan M, Lundh U. 'We do things together': A case study of 'couplehood' in dementia. Dementia. 2005; 4 :7–22. doi: 10.1177/1471301205049188. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Som CV. Nothing seems to have changed, nothing seems to be changing and perhaps nothing will change in the NHS: doctors' response to clinical governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005; 18 :463–477. doi: 10.1108/09513550510608903. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1985. [ Google Scholar ]
- Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001; 322 :1115–1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000; 320 :50–52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Mason J. Qualitative researching. London: Sage; 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
- Brazier A, Cooke K, Moravan V. Using Mixed Methods for Evaluating an Integrative Approach to Cancer Care: A Case Study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2008; 7 :5–17. doi: 10.1177/1534735407313395. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2. CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 1994. [ Google Scholar ]
- Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative research in health care. BMJ. 2000; 320 :114–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10 (1):67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-67. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001; 358 :483–488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 1994. [ Google Scholar ]
- Yin R. Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34 :1209–1224. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 2. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
- Howcroft D, Trauth E. Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research, Theory and Application. Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
- Blakie N. Approaches to Social Enquiry. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1993. [ Google Scholar ]
- Doolin B. Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Info Systems J. 2004; 14 :343–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00176.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Bloomfield BP, Best A. Management consultants: systems development, power and the translation of problems. Sociological Review. 1992; 40 :533–560. [ Google Scholar ]
- Shanks G, Parr A. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. Naples; 2003. Positivist, single case study research in information systems: A critical analysis. [ Google Scholar ]
- Open Access
- Published: 27 June 2011
The case study approach
- Sarah Crowe 1 ,
- Kathrin Cresswell 2 ,
- Ann Robertson 2 ,
- Guro Huby 3 ,
- Anthony Avery 1 &
- Aziz Sheikh 2
BMC Medical Research Methodology volume 11 , Article number: 100 ( 2011 ) Cite this article
595k Accesses
714 Citations
38 Altmetric
Metrics details
The case study approach allows in-depth, multi-faceted explorations of complex issues in their real-life settings. The value of the case study approach is well recognised in the fields of business, law and policy, but somewhat less so in health services research. Based on our experiences of conducting several health-related case studies, we reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the particular advantages and disadvantages of employing this methodological approach. The paper concludes with key pointers to aid those designing and appraising proposals for conducting case study research, and a checklist to help readers assess the quality of case study reports.
Peer Review reports
Introduction
The case study approach is particularly useful to employ when there is a need to obtain an in-depth appreciation of an issue, event or phenomenon of interest, in its natural real-life context. Our aim in writing this piece is to provide insights into when to consider employing this approach and an overview of key methodological considerations in relation to the design, planning, analysis, interpretation and reporting of case studies.
The illustrative 'grand round', 'case report' and 'case series' have a long tradition in clinical practice and research. Presenting detailed critiques, typically of one or more patients, aims to provide insights into aspects of the clinical case and, in doing so, illustrate broader lessons that may be learnt. In research, the conceptually-related case study approach can be used, for example, to describe in detail a patient's episode of care, explore professional attitudes to and experiences of a new policy initiative or service development or more generally to 'investigate contemporary phenomena within its real-life context' [ 1 ]. Based on our experiences of conducting a range of case studies, we reflect on when to consider using this approach, discuss the key steps involved and illustrate, with examples, some of the practical challenges of attaining an in-depth understanding of a 'case' as an integrated whole. In keeping with previously published work, we acknowledge the importance of theory to underpin the design, selection, conduct and interpretation of case studies[ 2 ]. In so doing, we make passing reference to the different epistemological approaches used in case study research by key theoreticians and methodologists in this field of enquiry.
This paper is structured around the following main questions: What is a case study? What are case studies used for? How are case studies conducted? What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided? We draw in particular on four of our own recently published examples of case studies (see Tables 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 ) and those of others to illustrate our discussion[ 3 – 7 ].
What is a case study?
A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life context. It is an established research design that is used extensively in a wide variety of disciplines, particularly in the social sciences. A case study can be defined in a variety of ways (Table 5 ), the central tenet being the need to explore an event or phenomenon in depth and in its natural context. It is for this reason sometimes referred to as a "naturalistic" design; this is in contrast to an "experimental" design (such as a randomised controlled trial) in which the investigator seeks to exert control over and manipulate the variable(s) of interest.
Stake's work has been particularly influential in defining the case study approach to scientific enquiry. He has helpfully characterised three main types of case study: intrinsic , instrumental and collective [ 8 ]. An intrinsic case study is typically undertaken to learn about a unique phenomenon. The researcher should define the uniqueness of the phenomenon, which distinguishes it from all others. In contrast, the instrumental case study uses a particular case (some of which may be better than others) to gain a broader appreciation of an issue or phenomenon. The collective case study involves studying multiple cases simultaneously or sequentially in an attempt to generate a still broader appreciation of a particular issue.
These are however not necessarily mutually exclusive categories. In the first of our examples (Table 1 ), we undertook an intrinsic case study to investigate the issue of recruitment of minority ethnic people into the specific context of asthma research studies, but it developed into a instrumental case study through seeking to understand the issue of recruitment of these marginalised populations more generally, generating a number of the findings that are potentially transferable to other disease contexts[ 3 ]. In contrast, the other three examples (see Tables 2 , 3 and 4 ) employed collective case study designs to study the introduction of workforce reconfiguration in primary care, the implementation of electronic health records into hospitals, and to understand the ways in which healthcare students learn about patient safety considerations[ 4 – 6 ]. Although our study focusing on the introduction of General Practitioners with Specialist Interests (Table 2 ) was explicitly collective in design (four contrasting primary care organisations were studied), is was also instrumental in that this particular professional group was studied as an exemplar of the more general phenomenon of workforce redesign[ 4 ].
What are case studies used for?
According to Yin, case studies can be used to explain, describe or explore events or phenomena in the everyday contexts in which they occur[ 1 ]. These can, for example, help to understand and explain causal links and pathways resulting from a new policy initiative or service development (see Tables 2 and 3 , for example)[ 1 ]. In contrast to experimental designs, which seek to test a specific hypothesis through deliberately manipulating the environment (like, for example, in a randomised controlled trial giving a new drug to randomly selected individuals and then comparing outcomes with controls),[ 9 ] the case study approach lends itself well to capturing information on more explanatory ' how ', 'what' and ' why ' questions, such as ' how is the intervention being implemented and received on the ground?'. The case study approach can offer additional insights into what gaps exist in its delivery or why one implementation strategy might be chosen over another. This in turn can help develop or refine theory, as shown in our study of the teaching of patient safety in undergraduate curricula (Table 4 )[ 6 , 10 ]. Key questions to consider when selecting the most appropriate study design are whether it is desirable or indeed possible to undertake a formal experimental investigation in which individuals and/or organisations are allocated to an intervention or control arm? Or whether the wish is to obtain a more naturalistic understanding of an issue? The former is ideally studied using a controlled experimental design, whereas the latter is more appropriately studied using a case study design.
Case studies may be approached in different ways depending on the epistemological standpoint of the researcher, that is, whether they take a critical (questioning one's own and others' assumptions), interpretivist (trying to understand individual and shared social meanings) or positivist approach (orientating towards the criteria of natural sciences, such as focusing on generalisability considerations) (Table 6 ). Whilst such a schema can be conceptually helpful, it may be appropriate to draw on more than one approach in any case study, particularly in the context of conducting health services research. Doolin has, for example, noted that in the context of undertaking interpretative case studies, researchers can usefully draw on a critical, reflective perspective which seeks to take into account the wider social and political environment that has shaped the case[ 11 ].
How are case studies conducted?
Here, we focus on the main stages of research activity when planning and undertaking a case study; the crucial stages are: defining the case; selecting the case(s); collecting and analysing the data; interpreting data; and reporting the findings.
Defining the case
Carefully formulated research question(s), informed by the existing literature and a prior appreciation of the theoretical issues and setting(s), are all important in appropriately and succinctly defining the case[ 8 , 12 ]. Crucially, each case should have a pre-defined boundary which clarifies the nature and time period covered by the case study (i.e. its scope, beginning and end), the relevant social group, organisation or geographical area of interest to the investigator, the types of evidence to be collected, and the priorities for data collection and analysis (see Table 7 )[ 1 ]. A theory driven approach to defining the case may help generate knowledge that is potentially transferable to a range of clinical contexts and behaviours; using theory is also likely to result in a more informed appreciation of, for example, how and why interventions have succeeded or failed[ 13 ].
For example, in our evaluation of the introduction of electronic health records in English hospitals (Table 3 ), we defined our cases as the NHS Trusts that were receiving the new technology[ 5 ]. Our focus was on how the technology was being implemented. However, if the primary research interest had been on the social and organisational dimensions of implementation, we might have defined our case differently as a grouping of healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors and/or nurses). The precise beginning and end of the case may however prove difficult to define. Pursuing this same example, when does the process of implementation and adoption of an electronic health record system really begin or end? Such judgements will inevitably be influenced by a range of factors, including the research question, theory of interest, the scope and richness of the gathered data and the resources available to the research team.
Selecting the case(s)
The decision on how to select the case(s) to study is a very important one that merits some reflection. In an intrinsic case study, the case is selected on its own merits[ 8 ]. The case is selected not because it is representative of other cases, but because of its uniqueness, which is of genuine interest to the researchers. This was, for example, the case in our study of the recruitment of minority ethnic participants into asthma research (Table 1 ) as our earlier work had demonstrated the marginalisation of minority ethnic people with asthma, despite evidence of disproportionate asthma morbidity[ 14 , 15 ]. In another example of an intrinsic case study, Hellstrom et al.[ 16 ] studied an elderly married couple living with dementia to explore how dementia had impacted on their understanding of home, their everyday life and their relationships.
For an instrumental case study, selecting a "typical" case can work well[ 8 ]. In contrast to the intrinsic case study, the particular case which is chosen is of less importance than selecting a case that allows the researcher to investigate an issue or phenomenon. For example, in order to gain an understanding of doctors' responses to health policy initiatives, Som undertook an instrumental case study interviewing clinicians who had a range of responsibilities for clinical governance in one NHS acute hospital trust[ 17 ]. Sampling a "deviant" or "atypical" case may however prove even more informative, potentially enabling the researcher to identify causal processes, generate hypotheses and develop theory.
In collective or multiple case studies, a number of cases are carefully selected. This offers the advantage of allowing comparisons to be made across several cases and/or replication. Choosing a "typical" case may enable the findings to be generalised to theory (i.e. analytical generalisation) or to test theory by replicating the findings in a second or even a third case (i.e. replication logic)[ 1 ]. Yin suggests two or three literal replications (i.e. predicting similar results) if the theory is straightforward and five or more if the theory is more subtle. However, critics might argue that selecting 'cases' in this way is insufficiently reflexive and ill-suited to the complexities of contemporary healthcare organisations.
The selected case study site(s) should allow the research team access to the group of individuals, the organisation, the processes or whatever else constitutes the chosen unit of analysis for the study. Access is therefore a central consideration; the researcher needs to come to know the case study site(s) well and to work cooperatively with them. Selected cases need to be not only interesting but also hospitable to the inquiry [ 8 ] if they are to be informative and answer the research question(s). Case study sites may also be pre-selected for the researcher, with decisions being influenced by key stakeholders. For example, our selection of case study sites in the evaluation of the implementation and adoption of electronic health record systems (see Table 3 ) was heavily influenced by NHS Connecting for Health, the government agency that was responsible for overseeing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT)[ 5 ]. This prominent stakeholder had already selected the NHS sites (through a competitive bidding process) to be early adopters of the electronic health record systems and had negotiated contracts that detailed the deployment timelines.
It is also important to consider in advance the likely burden and risks associated with participation for those who (or the site(s) which) comprise the case study. Of particular importance is the obligation for the researcher to think through the ethical implications of the study (e.g. the risk of inadvertently breaching anonymity or confidentiality) and to ensure that potential participants/participating sites are provided with sufficient information to make an informed choice about joining the study. The outcome of providing this information might be that the emotive burden associated with participation, or the organisational disruption associated with supporting the fieldwork, is considered so high that the individuals or sites decide against participation.
In our example of evaluating implementations of electronic health record systems, given the restricted number of early adopter sites available to us, we sought purposively to select a diverse range of implementation cases among those that were available[ 5 ]. We chose a mixture of teaching, non-teaching and Foundation Trust hospitals, and examples of each of the three electronic health record systems procured centrally by the NPfIT. At one recruited site, it quickly became apparent that access was problematic because of competing demands on that organisation. Recognising the importance of full access and co-operative working for generating rich data, the research team decided not to pursue work at that site and instead to focus on other recruited sites.
Collecting the data
In order to develop a thorough understanding of the case, the case study approach usually involves the collection of multiple sources of evidence, using a range of quantitative (e.g. questionnaires, audits and analysis of routinely collected healthcare data) and more commonly qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews, focus groups and observations). The use of multiple sources of data (data triangulation) has been advocated as a way of increasing the internal validity of a study (i.e. the extent to which the method is appropriate to answer the research question)[ 8 , 18 – 21 ]. An underlying assumption is that data collected in different ways should lead to similar conclusions, and approaching the same issue from different angles can help develop a holistic picture of the phenomenon (Table 2 )[ 4 ].
Brazier and colleagues used a mixed-methods case study approach to investigate the impact of a cancer care programme[ 22 ]. Here, quantitative measures were collected with questionnaires before, and five months after, the start of the intervention which did not yield any statistically significant results. Qualitative interviews with patients however helped provide an insight into potentially beneficial process-related aspects of the programme, such as greater, perceived patient involvement in care. The authors reported how this case study approach provided a number of contextual factors likely to influence the effectiveness of the intervention and which were not likely to have been obtained from quantitative methods alone.
In collective or multiple case studies, data collection needs to be flexible enough to allow a detailed description of each individual case to be developed (e.g. the nature of different cancer care programmes), before considering the emerging similarities and differences in cross-case comparisons (e.g. to explore why one programme is more effective than another). It is important that data sources from different cases are, where possible, broadly comparable for this purpose even though they may vary in nature and depth.
Analysing, interpreting and reporting case studies
Making sense and offering a coherent interpretation of the typically disparate sources of data (whether qualitative alone or together with quantitative) is far from straightforward. Repeated reviewing and sorting of the voluminous and detail-rich data are integral to the process of analysis. In collective case studies, it is helpful to analyse data relating to the individual component cases first, before making comparisons across cases. Attention needs to be paid to variations within each case and, where relevant, the relationship between different causes, effects and outcomes[ 23 ]. Data will need to be organised and coded to allow the key issues, both derived from the literature and emerging from the dataset, to be easily retrieved at a later stage. An initial coding frame can help capture these issues and can be applied systematically to the whole dataset with the aid of a qualitative data analysis software package.
The Framework approach is a practical approach, comprising of five stages (familiarisation; identifying a thematic framework; indexing; charting; mapping and interpretation) , to managing and analysing large datasets particularly if time is limited, as was the case in our study of recruitment of South Asians into asthma research (Table 1 )[ 3 , 24 ]. Theoretical frameworks may also play an important role in integrating different sources of data and examining emerging themes. For example, we drew on a socio-technical framework to help explain the connections between different elements - technology; people; and the organisational settings within which they worked - in our study of the introduction of electronic health record systems (Table 3 )[ 5 ]. Our study of patient safety in undergraduate curricula drew on an evaluation-based approach to design and analysis, which emphasised the importance of the academic, organisational and practice contexts through which students learn (Table 4 )[ 6 ].
Case study findings can have implications both for theory development and theory testing. They may establish, strengthen or weaken historical explanations of a case and, in certain circumstances, allow theoretical (as opposed to statistical) generalisation beyond the particular cases studied[ 12 ]. These theoretical lenses should not, however, constitute a strait-jacket and the cases should not be "forced to fit" the particular theoretical framework that is being employed.
When reporting findings, it is important to provide the reader with enough contextual information to understand the processes that were followed and how the conclusions were reached. In a collective case study, researchers may choose to present the findings from individual cases separately before amalgamating across cases. Care must be taken to ensure the anonymity of both case sites and individual participants (if agreed in advance) by allocating appropriate codes or withholding descriptors. In the example given in Table 3 , we decided against providing detailed information on the NHS sites and individual participants in order to avoid the risk of inadvertent disclosure of identities[ 5 , 25 ].
What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided?
The case study approach is, as with all research, not without its limitations. When investigating the formal and informal ways undergraduate students learn about patient safety (Table 4 ), for example, we rapidly accumulated a large quantity of data. The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted on the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources. This highlights a more general point of the importance of avoiding the temptation to collect as much data as possible; adequate time also needs to be set aside for data analysis and interpretation of what are often highly complex datasets.
Case study research has sometimes been criticised for lacking scientific rigour and providing little basis for generalisation (i.e. producing findings that may be transferable to other settings)[ 1 ]. There are several ways to address these concerns, including: the use of theoretical sampling (i.e. drawing on a particular conceptual framework); respondent validation (i.e. participants checking emerging findings and the researcher's interpretation, and providing an opinion as to whether they feel these are accurate); and transparency throughout the research process (see Table 8 )[ 8 , 18 – 21 , 23 , 26 ]. Transparency can be achieved by describing in detail the steps involved in case selection, data collection, the reasons for the particular methods chosen, and the researcher's background and level of involvement (i.e. being explicit about how the researcher has influenced data collection and interpretation). Seeking potential, alternative explanations, and being explicit about how interpretations and conclusions were reached, help readers to judge the trustworthiness of the case study report. Stake provides a critique checklist for a case study report (Table 9 )[ 8 ].
Conclusions
The case study approach allows, amongst other things, critical events, interventions, policy developments and programme-based service reforms to be studied in detail in a real-life context. It should therefore be considered when an experimental design is either inappropriate to answer the research questions posed or impossible to undertake. Considering the frequency with which implementations of innovations are now taking place in healthcare settings and how well the case study approach lends itself to in-depth, complex health service research, we believe this approach should be more widely considered by researchers. Though inherently challenging, the research case study can, if carefully conceptualised and thoughtfully undertaken and reported, yield powerful insights into many important aspects of health and healthcare delivery.
Yin RK: Case study research, design and method. 2009, London: Sage Publications Ltd., 4
Google Scholar
Keen J, Packwood T: Qualitative research; case study evaluation. BMJ. 1995, 311: 444-446.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sheikh A, Halani L, Bhopal R, Netuveli G, Partridge M, Car J, et al: Facilitating the Recruitment of Minority Ethnic People into Research: Qualitative Case Study of South Asians and Asthma. PLoS Med. 2009, 6 (10): 1-11.
Article Google Scholar
Pinnock H, Huby G, Powell A, Kielmann T, Price D, Williams S, et al: The process of planning, development and implementation of a General Practitioner with a Special Interest service in Primary Care Organisations in England and Wales: a comparative prospective case study. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO). 2008, [ http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/99-final-report.pdf ]
Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T, et al: Prospective evaluation of the implementation and adoption of NHS Connecting for Health's national electronic health record in secondary care in England: interim findings. BMJ. 2010, 41: c4564-
Pearson P, Steven A, Howe A, Sheikh A, Ashcroft D, Smith P, the Patient Safety Education Study Group: Learning about patient safety: organisational context and culture in the education of healthcare professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010, 15: 4-10. 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009052.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
van Harten WH, Casparie TF, Fisscher OA: The evaluation of the introduction of a quality management system: a process-oriented case study in a large rehabilitation hospital. Health Policy. 2002, 60 (1): 17-37. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00187-7.
Stake RE: The art of case study research. 1995, London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Sheikh A, Smeeth L, Ashcroft R: Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application. Br J Gen Pract. 2002, 52 (482): 746-51.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
King G, Keohane R, Verba S: Designing Social Inquiry. 1996, Princeton: Princeton University Press
Doolin B: Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology. 1998, 13: 301-311. 10.1057/jit.1998.8.
George AL, Bennett A: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. 2005, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Eccles M, the Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science. 2006, 1: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Netuveli G, Hurwitz B, Levy M, Fletcher M, Barnes G, Durham SR, Sheikh A: Ethnic variations in UK asthma frequency, morbidity, and health-service use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9456): 312-7.
Sheikh A, Panesar SS, Lasserson T, Netuveli G: Recruitment of ethnic minorities to asthma studies. Thorax. 2004, 59 (7): 634-
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hellström I, Nolan M, Lundh U: 'We do things together': A case study of 'couplehood' in dementia. Dementia. 2005, 4: 7-22. 10.1177/1471301205049188.
Som CV: Nothing seems to have changed, nothing seems to be changing and perhaps nothing will change in the NHS: doctors' response to clinical governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005, 18: 463-477. 10.1108/09513550510608903.
Lincoln Y, Guba E: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Newbury Park: Sage Publications
Barbour RS: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ. 2001, 322: 1115-1117. 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.
Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000, 320: 50-52. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.
Mason J: Qualitative researching. 2002, London: Sage
Brazier A, Cooke K, Moravan V: Using Mixed Methods for Evaluating an Integrative Approach to Cancer Care: A Case Study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2008, 7: 5-17. 10.1177/1534735407313395.
Miles MB, Huberman M: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 1994, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2
Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative research in health care. BMJ. 2000, 320: 114-116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.
Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A: Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010, 10 (1): 67-10.1186/1472-6947-10-67.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yin R: Case study research: design and methods. 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, 2
Yin R: Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999, 34: 1209-1224.
Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative methods for health research. 2009, Los Angeles: Sage, 2
Howcroft D, Trauth E: Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research, Theory and Application. 2005, Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar
Book Google Scholar
Blakie N: Approaches to Social Enquiry. 1993, Cambridge: Polity Press
Doolin B: Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Info Systems J. 2004, 14: 343-362. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00176.x.
Bloomfield BP, Best A: Management consultants: systems development, power and the translation of problems. Sociological Review. 1992, 40: 533-560.
Shanks G, Parr A: Positivist, single case study research in information systems: A critical analysis. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. 2003, Naples
Pre-publication history
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/100/prepub
Download references
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the participants and colleagues who contributed to the individual case studies that we have drawn on. This work received no direct funding, but it has been informed by projects funded by Asthma UK, the NHS Service Delivery Organisation, NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, and Patient Safety Research Portfolio. We would also like to thank the expert reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. Our thanks are also due to Dr. Allison Worth who commented on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Division of Primary Care, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Sarah Crowe & Anthony Avery
Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Kathrin Cresswell, Ann Robertson & Aziz Sheikh
School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Sarah Crowe .
Additional information
Competing interests.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
AS conceived this article. SC, KC and AR wrote this paper with GH, AA and AS all commenting on various drafts. SC and AS are guarantors.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reprints and Permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A. et al. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 11 , 100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Download citation
Received : 29 November 2010
Accepted : 27 June 2011
Published : 27 June 2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Case Study Approach
- Electronic Health Record System
- Case Study Design
- Case Study Site
- Case Study Report
BMC Medical Research Methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
- Submission enquiries: [email protected]
- General enquiries: [email protected]
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Methodology
- What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods
What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods
Published on May 8, 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on January 30, 2023.
A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organization, or phenomenon. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business research.
A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods , but quantitative methods are sometimes also used. Case studies are good for describing , comparing, evaluating and understanding different aspects of a research problem .
Table of contents
When to do a case study, step 1: select a case, step 2: build a theoretical framework, step 3: collect your data, step 4: describe and analyze the case.
A case study is an appropriate research design when you want to gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific real-world subject. It allows you to explore the key characteristics, meanings, and implications of the case.
Case studies are often a good choice in a thesis or dissertation . They keep your project focused and manageable when you don’t have the time or resources to do large-scale research.
You might use just one complex case study where you explore a single subject in depth, or conduct multiple case studies to compare and illuminate different aspects of your research problem.
Once you have developed your problem statement and research questions , you should be ready to choose the specific case that you want to focus on. A good case study should have the potential to:
- Provide new or unexpected insights into the subject
- Challenge or complicate existing assumptions and theories
- Propose practical courses of action to resolve a problem
- Open up new directions for future research
Unlike quantitative or experimental research , a strong case study does not require a random or representative sample. In fact, case studies often deliberately focus on unusual, neglected, or outlying cases which may shed new light on the research problem.
However, you can also choose a more common or representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience or phenomenon.
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
While case studies focus more on concrete details than general theories, they should usually have some connection with theory in the field. This way the case study is not just an isolated description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. It might aim to:
- Exemplify a theory by showing how it explains the case under investigation
- Expand on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that need to be incorporated
- Challenge a theory by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with established assumptions
To ensure that your analysis of the case has a solid academic grounding, you should conduct a literature review of sources related to the topic and develop a theoretical framework . This means identifying key concepts and theories to guide your analysis and interpretation.
There are many different research methods you can use to collect data on your subject. Case studies tend to focus on qualitative data using methods such as interviews , observations , and analysis of primary and secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles, photographs, official records). Sometimes a case study will also collect quantitative data.
The aim is to gain as thorough an understanding as possible of the case and its context.
In writing up the case study, you need to bring together all the relevant aspects to give as complete a picture as possible of the subject.
How you report your findings depends on the type of research you are doing. Some case studies are structured like a standard scientific paper or thesis , with separate sections or chapters for the methods , results and discussion .
Others are written in a more narrative style, aiming to explore the case from various angles and analyze its meanings and implications (for example, by using textual analysis or discourse analysis ).
In all cases, though, make sure to give contextual details about the case, connect it back to the literature and theory, and discuss how it fits into wider patterns or debates.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. (2023, January 30). What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved March 7, 2023, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/case-study/
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes
Other students also liked, primary vs. secondary sources | difference & examples, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is action research | definition & examples, what is your plagiarism score.
Case Study Research Method in Psychology
Saul Mcleod, PhD
Educator, Researcher
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul Mcleod, Ph.D., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years experience of working in further and higher education.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons), Psychology, MSc, Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
Case studies are in-depth investigations of a single person, group, event, or community. Typically, data is gathered from various sources and by using several different methods (e.g., observations & interviews ).
What are Case Studies?
The case study research method originated in clinical medicine (the case history, i.e., the patient’s personal history). In psychology, case studies are often confined to the study of a particular individual.
The information is mainly biographical and relates to events in the individual’s past (i.e., retrospective), as well as to significant events which are currently occurring in his or her everyday life.
The case study is not itself a research method, but researchers select methods of data collection and analysis that will generate material suitable for case studies.
Case studies are widely used in psychology, and amongst the best known were the ones carried out by Sigmund Freud, including Anna O and Little Hans .
Freud (1909a, 1909b) conducted very detailed investigations into the private lives of his patients in an attempt to both understand and help them overcome their illnesses. Even today, case histories are one of the main methods of investigation in abnormal psychology and psychiatry.
This makes it clear that the case study is a method that should only be used by a psychologist, therapist, or psychiatrist, i.e., someone with a professional qualification.
There is an ethical issue of competence. Only someone qualified to diagnose and treat a person can conduct a formal case study relating to atypical (i.e., abnormal) behavior or atypical development.
The procedure used in a case study means that the researcher provides a description of the behavior. This comes from interviews and other sources, such as observation.
The client also reports detail of events from his or her point of view. The researcher then writes up the information from both sources above as the case study and interprets the information.
The research may also continue for an extended period of time, so processes and developments can be studied as they happen.
Amongst the sources of data the psychologist is likely to turn to when carrying out a case study are observations of a person’s daily routine, unstructured interviews with the participant herself (and with people who know her), diaries, personal notes (e.g., letters, photographs, notes) or official document (e.g., case notes, clinical notes, appraisal reports).
The case study method often involves simply observing what happens to or reconstructing ‘the case history’ of a single participant or group of individuals (such as a school class or a specific social group), i.e., the idiographic approach .
The interview is also an extremely effective procedure for obtaining information about an individual, and it may be used to collect comments from the person’s friends, parents, employer, workmates, and others who have a good knowledge of the person, as well as to obtain facts from the person him or herself.
Most of this information is likely to be qualitative (i.e., verbal description rather than measurement), but the psychologist might collect numerical data as well.
The data collected can be analyzed using different theories (e.g., grounded theory, interpretative phenomenological analysis, text interpretation, e.g., thematic coding).
All the approaches mentioned here use preconceived categories in the analysis, and they are ideographic in their approach, i.e., they focus on the individual case without reference to a comparison group.
Interpreting the information means the researcher decides what to include or leave out. A good case study should always clarify which information is the factual description and which is an inference or the researcher’s opinion.
- Provides detailed (rich qualitative) information.
- Provides insight for further research.
- Permitting investigation of otherwise impractical (or unethical) situations.
Case studies allow a researcher to investigate a topic in far more detail than might be possible if they were trying to deal with a large number of research participants (nomothetic approach) with the aim of ‘averaging’.
Because of their in-depth, multi-sided approach, case studies often shed light on aspects of human thinking and behavior that would be unethical or impractical to study in other ways.
Research that only looks into the measurable aspects of human behavior is not likely to give us insights into the subjective dimension of experience, which is important to psychoanalytic and humanistic psychologists.
Case studies are often used in exploratory research. They can help us generate new ideas (that might be tested by other methods). They are an important way of illustrating theories and can help show how different aspects of a person’s life are related to each other.
The method is, therefore, important for psychologists who adopt a holistic point of view (i.e., humanistic psychologists ).
Limitations
- Lacking scientific rigor and providing little basis for generalization of results to the wider population.
- Researchers’ own subjective feelings may influence the case study (researcher bias).
- Difficult to replicate.
- Time-consuming and expensive.
- The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources.
Because a case study deals with only one person/event/group, we can never be sure if the case study investigated is representative of the wider body of “similar” instances. This means the conclusions drawn from a particular case may not be transferable to other settings.
Because case studies are based on the analysis of qualitative (i.e., descriptive) data, a lot depends on the psychologist’s interpretation of the information she has acquired.
This means that there is a lot of scope for observer bias , and it could be that the subjective opinions of the psychologist intrude in the assessment of what the data means.
For example, Freud has been criticized for producing case studies in which the information was sometimes distorted to fit particular behavioral theories (e.g., Little Hans ).
This is also true of Money’s interpretation of the Bruce/Brenda case study (Diamond, 1997) when he ignored evidence that went against his theory.
How to reference this article:
McLeod, S. A. (2019, August 03). Case study method . Simply Psychology. simplypsychology.org/case-study.html
Diamond, M., & Sigmundson, K. (1997). Sex Reassignment at Birth: Long-term Review and Clinical Implications. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine , 151(3), 298-304
Freud, S. (1909a). Analysis of a phobia of a five year old boy. In The Pelican Freud Library (1977), Vol 8, Case Histories 1, pages 169-306
Freud, S. (1909b). Bemerkungen über einen Fall von Zwangsneurose (Der “Rattenmann”). Jb. psychoanal. psychopathol. Forsch ., I, p. 357-421; GW, VII, p. 379-463; Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis, SE , 10: 151-318.
Further Information
Case Study Approach Case Study Method
Enhancing the Quality of Case Studies in Health Services Research
“We do things together” A case study of “couplehood” in dementia
Using mixed methods for evaluating an integrative approach to cancer care: a case study
Freud’s Case Studies
Little Hans – Freudian Case Study
H.M. Case Study
Anna O – Freudian Case Study
Genie Case Study – Curtiss (1977)
Research Methodologies Guide
- Action Research
- Bibliometrics
Case Studies
- Content Analysis
- Digital Scholarship
- Documentary
- Ethnography
- Focus Groups
- Grounded Theory
- Life Histories/Autobiographies
- Longitudinal
- Participant Observation
- Qualitative Research (General)
- Quasi-Experimental Design
- Usability Studies
"A case study is an empirical inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident" (Yin, 1994).
It refers to a type of research in which a case (an event, issue, population, or other item being studied) is analyzed, often through the use of multiple methods of analysis.
Tools commonly used in case studies include:
- Observations
For more information about case studies, review the resources below:
Books and articles
- Five Misunderstandings About Case Study Research [pdf] An article reflecting on common issues in case study research.
- Case Study Research and Applications by Robert K. Yin Publication Date: 2017
- Qualitative Research Through Case Studies by Max Travers Publication Date: 2001
- Unravelling the Mysteries of Case Study Research by Marilyn L. Taylor; Mikael Søndergaard Publication Date: 2017
Additional Resources
- Case Studies A tutorial on case study research from Colorado State University.
- Case Study - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Wikipedia can be a useful place to start your research- check the citations at the bottom of the article for more information.
- << Previous: Bibliometrics
- Next: Content Analysis >>
- Last Updated: Jan 19, 2023 11:18 AM
- URL: https://instr.iastate.libguides.com/researchmethods
Case Study Examples
This post was originally posted as part of the February 2021Methodspace focus on Choosing Methodology and Methods .
Open-Access Articles Using Case Study Methodology
As you can see from this collection, case study methods are used in both qualitative and quantitative research.
Ang, C.-S., Lee, K.-F., & Dipolog-Ubanan, G. F. (2019). Determinants of First-Year Student Identity and Satisfaction in Higher Education: A Quantitative Case Study. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019846689
Abstract. First-year undergraduates’ expectations and experience of university and student engagement variables were investigated to determine how these perceptions influence their student identity and overall course satisfaction. Data collected from 554 first-year undergraduates at a large private university were analyzed. Participants were given the adapted version of the Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education Survey to self-report their learning experience and engagement in the university community. The results showed that, in general, the students’ reasons of pursuing tertiary education were to open the door to career opportunities and skill development. Moreover, students’ views on their learning and university engagement were at the moderate level. In relation to student identity and overall student satisfaction, it is encouraging to state that their perceptions of studentship and course satisfaction were rather positive. After controlling for demographics, student engagement appeared to explain more variance in student identity, whereas students’ expectations and experience explained greater variance in students’ overall course satisfaction. Implications for practice, limitations, and recommendation of this study are addressed.
Baker, A. J. (2017). Algorithms to Assess Music Cities: Case Study—Melbourne as a Music Capital. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017691801
Abstract. The global Mastering of a Music City report in 2015 notes that the concept of music cities has penetrated the global political vernacular because it delivers “significant economic, employment, cultural and social benefits.” This article highlights that no empirical study has combined all these values and offers a relevant and comprehensive definition of a music city. Drawing on industry research,1 the article assesses how mathematical flowcharts, such as Algorithm A (Economics), Algorithm B (Four T’s creative index), and Algorithm C (Heritage), have contributed to the definition of a music city. Taking Melbourne as a case study, it illustrates how Algorithms A and B are used as disputed evidence about whether the city is touted as Australia’s music capital. The article connects the three algorithms to an academic framework from musicology, urban studies, cultural economics, and sociology, and proposes a benchmark Algorithm D (Music Cities definition), which offers a more holistic assessment of music activity in any urban context. The article concludes by arguing that Algorithm D offers a much-needed definition of what comprises a music city because it builds on the popular political economy focus and includes the social importance of space and cultural practices.
Brown, K., & Mondon, A. (2020). Populism, the media, and the mainstreaming of the far right: The Guardian’s coverage of populism as a case study. Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720955036
Abstract. Populism seems to define our current political age. The term is splashed across the headlines, brandished in political speeches and commentaries, and applied extensively in numerous academic publications and conferences. This pervasive usage, or populist hype, has serious implications for our understanding of the meaning of populism itself and for our interpretation of the phenomena to which it is applied. In particular, we argue that its common conflation with far-right politics, as well as its breadth of application to other phenomena, has contributed to the mainstreaming of the far right in three main ways: (1) agenda-setting power and deflection, (2) euphemisation and trivialisation, and (3) amplification. Through a mixed-methods approach to discourse analysis, this article uses The Guardian newspaper as a case study to explore the development of the populist hype and the detrimental effects of the logics that it has pushed in public discourse.
Droy, L. T., Goodwin, J., & O’Connor, H. (2020). Methodological Uncertainty and Multi-Strategy Analysis: Case Study of the Long-Term Effects of Government Sponsored Youth Training on Occupational Mobility. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 147–148(1–2), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106320939893
Abstract. Sociological practitioners often face considerable methodological uncertainty when undertaking a quantitative analysis. This methodological uncertainty encompasses both data construction (e.g. defining variables) and analysis (e.g. selecting and specifying a modelling procedure). Methodological uncertainty can lead to results that are fragile and arbitrary. Yet, many practitioners may be unaware of the potential scale of methodological uncertainty in quantitative analysis, and the recent emergence of techniques for addressing it. Recent proposals for ‘multi-strategy’ approaches seek to identify and manage methodological uncertainty in quantitative analysis. We present a case-study of a multi-strategy analysis, applied to the problem of estimating the long-term impact of 1980s UK government-sponsored youth training. We use this case study to further highlight the problem of cumulative methodological fragilities in applied quantitative sociology and to discuss and help develop multi-strategy analysis as a tool to address them.
Ebneyamini, S., & Sadeghi Moghadam, M. R. (2018). Toward Developing a Framework for Conducting Case Study Research . International Journal of Qualitative Methods . https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918817954
Abstract. This article reviews the use of case study research for both practical and theoretical issues especially in management field with the emphasis on management of technology and innovation. Many researchers commented on the methodological issues of the case study research from their point of view thus, presenting a comprehensive framework was missing. We try representing a general framework with methodological and analytical perspective to design, develop, and conduct case study research. To test the coverage of our framework, we have analyzed articles in three major journals related to the management of technology and innovation to approve our framework. This study represents a general structure to guide, design, and fulfill a case study research with levels and steps necessary for researchers to use in their research.
Lynch, R., Young, J. C., Boakye-Achampong, S., Jowaisas, C., Sam, J., & Norlander, B. (2020). Benefits of crowdsourcing for libraries: A case study from Africa . IFLA Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220944940
Abstract. Many libraries in the Global South do not collect comprehensive data about themselves, which creates challenges in terms of local and international visibility. Crowdsourcing is an effective tool that engages the public to collect missing data, and it has proven to be particularly valuable in countries where governments collect little public data. Whereas crowdsourcing is often used within fields that have high levels of development funding, such as health, the authors believe that this approach would have many benefits for the library field as well. They present qualitative and quantitative evidence from 23 African countries involved in a crowdsourcing project to map libraries. The authors find benefits in terms of increased connections between stakeholders, capacity-building, and increased local visibility. These findings demonstrate the potential of crowdsourced approaches for tasks such as mapping to benefit libraries and similarly positioned institutions in the Global South in multifaceted ways.
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers . International Journal of Qualitative Methods . https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
Abstract. Qualitative case study methodology enables researchers to conduct an in-depth exploration of intricate phenomena within some specific context. By keeping in mind research students, this article presents a systematic step-by-step guide to conduct a case study in the business discipline. Research students belonging to said discipline face issues in terms of clarity, selection, and operationalization of qualitative case study while doing their final dissertation. These issues often lead to confusion, wastage of valuable time, and wrong decisions that affect the overall outcome of the research. This article presents a checklist comprised of four phases, that is, foundation phase, prefield phase, field phase, and reporting phase. The objective of this article is to provide novice researchers with practical application of this checklist by linking all its four phases with the authors’ experiences and learning from recently conducted in-depth multiple case studies in the organizations of New Zealand. Rather than discussing case study in general, a targeted step-by-step plan with real-time research examples to conduct a case study is given.
VanWynsberghe, R., & Khan, S. (2007). Redefining Case Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690700600208
Abstract. In this paper the authors propose a more precise and encompassing definition of case study than is usually found. They support their definition by clarifying that case study is neither a method nor a methodology nor a research design as suggested by others. They use a case study prototype of their own design to propose common properties of case study and demonstrate how these properties support their definition. Next, they present several living myths about case study and refute them in relation to their definition. Finally, they discuss the interplay between the terms case study and unit of analysis to further delineate their definition of case study. The target audiences for this paper include case study researchers, research design and methods instructors, and graduate students interested in case study research.
More MethodSpace Posts about Case Study Research
Case study methods are used by researchers in many disciplines. Here are some open-access articles about multimodal qualitative or mixed methods designs that include both qualitative and quantitative elements.
Case study methodology is both unique, and uniquely confusing. It is unique given one characteristic: case studies draw from more than one data source.
Find an 8-step process for using research cases to teach methods.
What is case study methodology? It is unique given one characteristic: case studies draw from more than one data source.
Find discussion of case studies and published examples.
Istanbul as a regional computational social science hub
Experiments and quantitative methodologies.
Research Methodology Tutorial
Case Study Method in Research Methodology - Research Methodology
- Interview Question
- All Tutorials
- Pragnyameter
- Practice Test
Meaning: The case study method is a very popular form of qualitative analysis and involves a careful and complete observation of a social unit, be that unit a person, a family, an institution, a cultural group or even the entire community. It is a method of study in depth rather than breadth. The case study places more emphasis on the full analysis of a limited number of events or conditions and their interrelations. The case study deals with the processes that take place and their interrelationship. Thus, case study is essentially an intensive investigation of the particular unit under consideration. The object of the case study method is to locate the factors that account for the behaviour-patterns of the given unit as an integrated totality.
Case study method of Data Collection
According to H. Odum, “The case study method of data collection is a technique by which individual factor whether it be an institution or just an episode in the life of an individual or a group is analysed in its relationship to any other in the group.” Thus, a fairly exhaustive study of a person (as to what he does and has done, what he thinks he does and had done and what he expects to do and says he ought to do) or group is called a life or case history. Burgess has used the words “the social microscope” for the case study method.” Pauline V. Young describes case study as “a comprehensive study of a social unit be that unit a person, a group, a social institution, a district or a community.” In brief, we can say that case study method is a form of qualitative analysis where in careful and complete observation of an individual or a situation or an institution is done; efforts are made to study each and every aspect of the concerning unit in minute details and then from case data generalisations and inferences are drawn.
Characteristics of Case Study method
The important characteristics of the case study method are as under:
- Under this method the researcher can take one single social unit or more of such units for his study purpose; he may even take a situation to study the same comprehensively.
- Here the selected unit is studied intensively i.e., it is studied in minute details. Generally, the study extends over a long period of time to ascertain the natural history of the unit so as to obtain enough information for drawing correct inferences.
- In the context of this method we make complete study of the social unit covering all facets. Through this method we try to understand the complex of factors that are operative within a social unit as an integrated totality.
- Under this method the approach happens to be qualitative and not quantitative. Mere quantitative information is not collected. Every possible effort is made to collect information concerning all aspects of life. As such, case study deepens our perception and gives us a clear insight into life. For instance, under this method we not only study how many crimes a man has done but shall peep into the factors that forced him to commit crimes when we are making a case study of a man as a criminal. The objective of the study may be to suggest ways to reform the criminal.
- In respect of the case study method an effort is made to know the mutual inter-relationship of causal factors.
- Under case study method the behaviour pattern of the concerning unit is studied directly and not by an indirect and abstract approach.
- Case study method results in fruitful hypotheses along with the data which may be helpful in testing them, and thus it enables the generalised knowledge to get richer and richer. In its absence, generalised social science may get handicapped.
Evolution and scope: The case study method is a widely used systematic field research technique in sociology these days. The credit for introducing this method to the field of social investigation goes to Frederic Le Play who used it as a hand-maiden to statistics in his studies of family budgets. Herbert Spencer was the first to use case material in his comparative study of different cultures. Dr. William Healy resorted to this method in his study of juvenile delinquency, and considered it as a better method over and above the mere use of statistical data. Similarly, anthropologists, historians, novelists and dramatists have used this method concerning problems pertaining to their areas of interests. Even management experts use case study methods for getting clues to several management problems. In brief, case study method is being used in several disciplines. Not only this, its use is increasing day by day.
Assumptions: The case study method is based on several assumptions. The important assumptions may be listed as follows:
- The assumption of uniformity in the basic human nature in spite of the fact that human behaviour may vary according to situations.
- The assumption of studying the natural history of the unit concerned.
- The assumption of comprehensive study of the unit concerned.
Major phases involved: Major phases involved in case study are as follows:
- Recognition and determination of the status of the phenomenon to be investigated or the unit of attention.
- Collection of data, examination and history of the given phenomenon.
- Diagnosis and identification of causal factors as a basis for remedial or developmental treatment.
- Application of remedial measures i.e., treatment and therapy (this phase is often characterized as case work).
- Follow-up programme to determine effectiveness of the treatment applied.
Advantages: There are several advantages of the case study method that follow from the various characteristics outlined above. Mention may be made here of the important advantages.
- Being an exhaustive study of a social unit, the case study method enables us to understand fully the behaviour pattern of the concerned unit. In the words of Charles Horton Cooley, “case study deepens our perception and gives us a clearer insight into life…. It gets at behaviour directly and not by an indirect and abstract approach.”
- Through case study a researcher can obtain a real and enlightened record of personal experiences which would reveal man’s inner strivings, tensions and motivations that drive him to action along with the forces that direct him to adopt a certain pattern of behaviour.
- This method enables the researcher to trace out the natural history of the social unit and its relationship with the social factors and the forces involved in its surrounding environment.
- It helps in formulating relevant hypotheses along with the data which may be helpful in testing them. Case studies, thus, enable the generalised knowledge to get richer and richer.
- The method facilitates intensive study of social units which is generally not possible if we use either the observation method or the method of collecting information through schedules. This is the reason why case study method is being frequently used, particularly in social researches.
- Information collected under the case study method helps a lot to the researcher in the task of constructing the appropriate questionnaire or schedule for the said task requires thorough knowledge of the concerning universe.
- The researcher can use one or more of the several research methods under the case study method depending upon the prevalent circumstances. In other words, the use of different methods such as depth interviews, questionnaires, documents, study reports of individuals, letters, and the like is possible under case study method.
- Case study method has proved beneficial in determining the nature of units to be studied along with the nature of the universe. This is the reason why at times the case study method is alternatively known as “mode of organising data”.
- This method is a means to well understand the past of a social unit because of its emphasis of historical analysis. Besides, it is also a technique to suggest measures for improvement in the context of the present environment of the concerned social units.
- Case studies constitute the perfect type of sociological material as they represent a real record of personal experiences which very often escape the attention of most of the skilled researchers using other techniques.
- Case study method enhances the experience of the researcher and this in turn increases his analysing ability and skill.
- This method makes possible the study of social changes. On account of the minute study of the different facets of a social unit, the researcher can well understand the social change then and now. This also facilitates the drawing of inferences and helps in maintaining the continuity of the research process. In fact, it may be considered the gateway to and at the same time the final destination of abstract knowledge.
- Case study techniques are indispensable for therapeutic and administrative purposes. They are also of immense value in taking decisions regarding several management problems. Case data are quite useful for diagnosis, therapy and other practical case problems.
Limitations: Important limitations of the case study method may as well be highlighted.
- Case situations are seldom comparable and as such the information gathered in case studies is often not comparable. Since the subject under case study tells history in his own words, logical concepts and units of scientific classification have to be read into it or out of it by the investigator.
- Read Bain does not consider the case data as significant scientific data since they do not provide knowledge of the “impersonal, universal, non-ethical, non-practical, repetitive aspects of phenomena.” Real information is often not collected because the subjectivity of the researcher does enter in the collection of information in a case study.
- The danger of false generalisation is always there in view of the fact that no set rules are followed in collection of the information and only few units are studied.
- It consumes more time and requires lot of expenditure. More time is needed under case study method since one studies the natural history cycles of social units and that too minutely.
- The case data are often vitiated because the subject, according to Read Bain, may write what he thinks the investigator wants; and the greater the rapport, the more subjective the whole process is.
- Case study method is based on several assumptions which may not be very realistic at times, and as such the usefulness of case data is always subject to doubt.
- Case study method can be used only in a limited sphere., it is not possible to use it in case of a big society. Sampling is also not possible under a case study method.
- Response of the investigator is an important limitation of the case study method. He often thinks that he has full knowledge of the unit and can himself answer about it. In case the same is not true, then consequences follow. In fact, this is more the fault of the researcher rather than that of the case method.
Research Methodology Interview Questions
Research Methodology Practice Tests
List of Tutorials
- Adobe Robohelp Tutorial
- Sublime Text Tutorial
- GItlab Tutorial
- Adobe InDesign CC Tutorial
- SaltStack Tutorial
List of Topics
- Eager to Learn
- Handy Tools & Techniques
- Keep the Assets Safely
- Testing is the Religion
- Interview Questions
- RTGS Interview Questions
- Private Equity Interview Questions
- Excel Formulas Interview Questions
- Job Recommendation(Latest)
Skills by Location
- Ajax Jobs In Pune
- Android Jobs In Mumbai
- Angularjs Jobs In Bangalore
- Analytics Jobs In Hyderabad
- Animation Jobs In Bangalore
- AWS Jobs In Chennai
- Blue Prism Jobs In Pune
- Bootstrap Jobs In Bangalore
- C Jobs In Hyderabad
- Cloud Jobs In Chennai
- Codeigniter Jobs In Pune
- Db2 Jobs In Mumbai
- Designer Jobs In Gurgaon
- Devops Jobs In Hyderabad
- Docker Jobs In Bangalore
- Dreamweaver Jobs In Chennai
- EMC Storage Jobs In Mumbai
- Etl Testing Jobs In Pune
- Firmware Jobs In Mumbai
- Flash Jobs In Hyderabad
- Google Cloud Jobs In Bangalore
- Google Maps Jobs In Hyderabad
- HTML Jobs In Coimbatore
- Hadoop Jobs In Hyderabad
- Informatica Jobs In Chennai
- IOS Developer Jobs In Mumbai
- Java Developer Jobs In Pune
- Javascript Jobs In Hyderabad
- Jboss Jobs In Chennai
- Jenkins Jobs In Mumbai
- Joomla Jobs In Pune
- Jquery Jobs In Hyderabad
- Kpo Jobs In Kolkata
- Linux Jobs In Chennai
- Maven Jobs In Hyderabad
- MS SQL Server Jobs In Delhi
- Networking Jobs In Noida
- Oracle DBA Jobs In Kolkata
- PHP Jobs In Chennai
- Photoshop Jobs In Hyderabad
- Puppet Jobs In Bangalore
- Python Jobs In Pune
- Qlikview Jobs In Hyderabad
- Qtp Jobs In Pune
- DBMS Jobs In Hyderabad
- Red Hat Cloud Jobs In Bangalore
- RPA Jobs In Bangalore
- Salesforce CRM Jobs In Delhi
- SAP ABAP Jobs In Gurgaon
- SAP Hybris Jobs In Bangalore
- Selenium Jobs In Karnataka
- Tableau Jobs In Bangalore
- UI Developer Jobs In Bangalore
- UI Path Jobs In Noida
- Ui/Ux Jobs In Hyderabad
- VLSI Design Jobs In Chennai
- Web Services Jobs In Delhi
- Wordpress Jobs In Bangalore
- Accountant Jobs In Hyderabad
- Admin Executive Jobs In Kolkata
- Airport Jobs In Hyderabad
- Architecture Jobs In Delhi
- AutoCAD Jobs In Chennai
- Backend Jobs In Mumbai
- Back Office Jobs In Bangalore
- BPO Jobs In Chennai
- Bank Jobs In Bangalore
- Call Center Jobs In Chennai
- Civil Engineering Jobs In Chennai
- Digital Marketing Jobs In Delhi
- Driver Jobs In Delhi
- Data Entry Jobs In Bangalore
- Electrical Jobs In Chennai
- Finance Jobs In Mumbai
- Freelancer Jobs In Hyderabad
- Front Desk Jobs In Kolkata
- Faculty Jobs In Mumbai
- Hotel Jobs In Bangalore
- HR Jobs In Noida
- Logistics Jobs In Chennai
- Marketing Jobs In Mysore
- MBA Jobs In Hyderabad
- Sales Jobs In Mumbai
- Supervisor Jobs In Delhi
- Tally Jobs In Hyderabad
- Naukri Jobs
- Monster India Jobs
- Indeed Jobs
- Advanced Search
- Freshers world
- Free job alert
- Sarkari Result
- Find all Jobs
- Browse all Jobs
- Jobs By Skills
- Jobs By Designations
- Jobs By Category
Jobs By Companies
- Adani Port Careers
- Adani Power Limited Careers
- Aditi Technologies Careers
- AEGIS Careers
- Amazon Careers
- Andhra Bank Careers
- APL Logistics Careers
- Apollo Tyres Careers
- Apple Careers
- Arvind Careers
- Ashok Leyland Careers
- Asian Paints Careers
- Aurobindo Pharma Careers
- Axis Bank Careers
- Bajaj Finserv Careers
- Bharti Airtel Careers
- Bharat Petroleum Careers
- Bhushan Steel Careers
- Biocon Careers
- Birla Careers
- Blue Star Careers
- Bosch Careers
- Brigade Group Careers
- Canara Bank Careers
- Capgemini Careers
- CESC Careers
- Cipla Careers
- CTS Careers
- Convergys Careers
- Cummins Careers
- Cyient Careers
- Dell Careers
- Dewan Housing Finance Careers
- DLF Group Careers
- EBay Inc. Careers
- EMC Careers
- Exide Careers
- Federal Bank Careers
- Future Retail Careers
- GETIT Infoservices Careers
- Gitanjali Gems Careers
- Godrej Careers
- HCL Careers
- HDFC Bank Careers
- Hero Motors Careers
- Hewlett Packard Careers
- Hexaware Careers
- Hinduja Global Solutions Careers
- Hindustan Construction Careers
- HSBC Careers
- ICICI Bank Careers
- IBM Careers
- Idea Cellular Careers
- IGATE Global Solutions Careers
- Indian Oil Careers
- Indian Overseas Bank Careers
- Indusind Bank Careers
- Infosys Careers
- Ingram Micro Careers
- Intel Careers
- ITC Careers
- Jet Airways Careers
- Jindal Careers
- Jindal Stainless Careers
- JSW Steel Careers
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Careers
- Larsen & Toubro Careers
- Lupin Careers
- MPhasis Careers
- Nestle Careers
- NTPC Careers
- Oracle Careers
- Qualcomm Careers
- Quest Global Careers
- Ramco Systems Careers
- Reliance Capital Careers
- Rolta Careers
- Sitel Careers
- Sonata Software Careers
- TCS Careers
- Tata Motors Careers
- Tech Mahindra Careers
- Thirdware Careers
- Titan Industries Careers
- Tvs Motor Careers
- Xerox Careers
- Zensar Technologies Careers
- Zoho Corp Careers
- View All Companies
- Jobs in Delhi
- Jobs in Bangalore
- Jobs in Chennai
- Jobs in Mumbai
- Jobs in Pune
- Jobs in Hyderabad
- Jobs in Kolkata
- Jobs in Chandigarh
- Jobs in Gurgaon
- Jobs in Noida
- Jobs in Ahmedabad
- Jobs in Vijayawada
Jobs in Andhra Pradesh
- Jobs in Visakhapatnam
- Jobs in Tirupati
- Jobs in Guntur
- Jobs in Rajahmundry
Jobs in Assam
- Jobs in Dibrugarh
- Jobs in Guwahati
- Jobs in Silchar
- Jobs in Tezpur
Jobs in Chhattisgarh
- Jobs in Raipur
- Jobs in Raigarh
- Jobs in Korba
- Jobs in Bilaspur
Jobs in Gujarat
- Jobs in Rajkot
- Jobs in Gandhinagar
- Jobs in Surat
- Jobs in Vadodara
Jobs in Haryana
- Jobs in Ambala
- Jobs in Faridabad
- Jobs in Dharuhera
- Jobs in Hisar
Jobs in Jharkhand
- Jobs in Bokaro
- Jobs in Dhanbad
- Jobs in Jamshedpur
- Jobs in Ranchi
Jobs in Kerala
- Jobs in Trivandrum
- Jobs in Kottayam
- Jobs in Ernakulam
- Jobs in Kollam
Jobs in Karnataka
- Jobs in Bidar
- Jobs in Mysore
- Jobs in Gulbarga
- Jobs in Mangalore
Jobs in Uttarakhand
- Jobs in Dehradun
- Jobs in Haridwar
- Jobs in Kashipur
- Jobs in Pantnagar
Jobs in Madhya Pradesh
- Jobs in Bhopal
- Jobs in Indore
- Jobs in Jabalpur
- Jobs in Ujjain
Jobs in Odisha
- Jobs in Bhubaneshwar
- Jobs in Cuttack
- Jobs in Puri
- Jobs in Jharsuguda
Jobs in Rajasthan
- Jobs in Jodhpur
- Jobs in Jaipur
- Jobs in Mount Abu
- Jobs in Udaipur
Jobs in Punjab
- Jobs in Amritsar
- Jobs in Patiala
- Jobs in Rajpura
- Jobs in Mohali
Jobs in Tamil Nadu
- Jobs in Kanchipuram
- Jobs in Madurai
- Jobs in Ooty
- Jobs in Coimbatore
Jobs in Telangana
- Jobs in Nizamabad
- Jobs in Khammam
- Jobs in Karimnagar
- Jobs in Warangal
Jobs in Uttar Pradesh
- Jobs in Lucknow
- Jobs in Allahabad
- Jobs in Kanpur
- Jobs in Varanasi
Jobs in West Bengal
- Jobs in Kharagpur
- Jobs in Burdwan
- Jobs in Haldia
- Jobs in Siliguri
Jobs in Maharashtra
- Jobs in Nasik
- Jobs in Solapur
- Jobs in Navi Mumbai
- Jobs in Nagpur
Jobs in Himachal Pradesh
- Jobs in Shimla
- Jobs in Chamba
- Jobs in Dalhousie
- Jobs in Dharmasala
Jobs in Jammu Kashmir
- Jobs in Jammu
- Jobs in Srinagar
Jobs in Meghalaya
- Jobs in Shillong
Jobs in Goa
- Jobs in Panjim
- Jobs in Vasco Da Gama
Jobs in Nagaland
- Jobs in Dimapur
- Jobs in Kohima
- View All Locations
State Govt Jobs
- AP Government Jobs
- Bihar Government Jobs
- Delhi Government Jobs
- Gujarat Government Jobs
- Jharkhand Government Jobs
- Karnataka Government Jobs
- Kerala Government Jobs
- Maharashtra Government Jobs
- Orissa Government Jobs
- Punjab Government Jobs
- Rajasthan Government Jobs
- Tamilnadu Government Jobs
- Telangana Government Jobs
- UP Government Jobs
- West Bengal Government Jobs
- View All Government Jobs
- Allahabad bank Jobs
- Axis Bank Jobs
- Bank of Baroda Jobs
- Bank Of India Jobs
- Bank Of Maharashtra Jobs
- Canara Bank Jobs
- Corporation Bank Jobs
- Cosmos Bank Jobs
- Federal Bank Jobs
- HDFC Bank Jobs
- ICICI Bank Jobs
- IDBI Bank Jobs
- Karur Vysya Bank Jobs
- Reserve Bank of India Jobs
- State Bank of India Jobs
- View All Banks Jobs
Defence Jobs
- Indian Army Jobs
- Indian Air Force Jobs
- Indian Navy Jobs
- Police Jobs
- AIATSL Recruitment Jobs
- Bihar Police Recruitment Jobs
- BSF Constable Recruitment Jobs
- CISF Recruitment Jobs
- HAL Recruitment Jobs
- Manipur Police Recruitment Jobs
- MTS Air Force Jobs
- UP Police Recruitment Jobs
- View All Defence Jobs
- View All PSC
- Bihar SSC Recruitment Jobs
- SSC Central Jobs
- State Wise SSC Posts Jobs
- OSSC Recruitment Jobs
- HPSSC Recruitment Jobs
- HSSC Recruitment Jobs
- SSC Allahabad Recruitment Jobs
- SSC Assistant Grade Jobs
- SSC Constable Recruitment Jobs
- SSC ER Recruitment Jobs
- SSC Karnataka Recruitment Jobs
- SSC Kerala Recruitment Jobs
- SSC NWR Recrutment Jobs
- SSC WR Recruitment Jobs
- SSCMPR Recruitment Jobs
- View All SSC Jobs
Railway Jobs
- Central Railway Recruitment Jobs
- CLW Recruitment Jobs
- CRWC Recruitment Jobs
- DLW Recruitment Jobs
- Eastern Railway Recruitment Jobs
- Gujarat Metro Rail Recruitment Jobs
- ICRON Recruitment Jobs
- IRSDC Recruitment Jobs
- Kochi Metro Rail Recruitment Jobs
- Mumbai Metro Rail Recruitment jobs
- RRB Ahmedabad Recruitment jobs
- RRB Secunderabad Recruitment jobs
- RRC Central Railway Recruitment jobs
- RVNL Recruitment Jobs
- View All Railway Jobs
Latest walkins
- Today walkins
- Tomorrow walkins
- Latest Walkins
- Fresher Walkins
Walkins by Skill
- Bpo Walkins In Bangalore
- Bpo Walkins In Chennai
- Bpo Walkins In Gurgaon
- Bpo Walkins In Hyderabad
- Bpo Walkins In Mumbai
- Bpo Walkins In Pune
- Dot Net Walkins In Bangalore
- Dot Net Walkins In Chennai
- Dot Net Walkins In Gurgaon
- Dot Net Walkins In Hyderabad
- Dot Net Walkins In Pune
- Java Walkins In Bangalore
- Java Walkins In Chennai
- Java Walkins In Gurgaon
- Java Walkins In Hyderabad
- Java Walkins In Kolkata
- Java Walkins In Mumbai
- Java Walkins In Pune
- Php Walkins In Bangalore
- Php Walkins In Chennai
- Php Walkins In Gurgaon
- Php Walkins In Hyderabad
- Php Walkins In Mumbai
- Php Walkins In Pune
Walkins by location
- Walkins In Ahmedabad
- Walkins In Bangalore
- Walkins In Chandigarh
- Walkins In Chennai
- Walkins In Delhi
- Walkins In Gurgaon
- Walkins In Guwahati
- Walkins In Hyderabad
- Walkins In Jaipur
- Walkins In Kanpur
- Walkins In Kolkata
- Walkins In Mumbai
- Walkins In Noida
- Walkins In Patna
- Walkins In Pune
- Walkins In Surat
- Today Walkins In Ahmedabad
- Today Walkins In Bangalore
- Today Walkins In Chandigarh
- Today Walkins In Chennai
- Today Walkins In Delhi
- Today Walkins In Gurgaon
- Today Walkins In Guwahati
- Today Walkins In Hyderabad
- Today Walkins In Jaipur
- Today Walkins In Kanpur
- Today Walkins In Kolkata
- Today Walkins In Mumbai
- Today Walkins In Noida
- Today Walkins In Patna
- Today Walkins In Pune
- Today Walkins In Surat
Walkins by Company
- Amazon Walkins In Delhi
- Google Walkins In Noida
- Google Walkins In Mumbai
- HSBC Walkins In Chennai
- HSBC Walkins In Mumbai
- HSBC Walkins In Hyderabad
- HSBC Walkins In Bangalore
- HCL Walkins In Mumbai
- HCL Walkins In Hyderabad
- HCL Walkins In Bangalore
- IBM Walkins In Bangalore
- IBM Walkins In Chennai
- IBM Walkins In Hyderabad
- Infosys Walkins In Bangalore
- Infosys Walkins In Chennai
- Infosys Walkins In Mumbai
- TCS Walkins In Bangalore
- TCS Walkins In Hyderabad
- TCS Walkins In Mumbai
- Tech Mahindra Walkins In Chandigarh
- Tech Mahindra Walkins In Chennai
- Tech Mahindra Walkins In Delhi
- Tech Mahindra Walkins In Gurgaon
- Tech Mahindra Walkins In Hyderabad
- Tech Mahindra Walkins In Noida
- Tech Mahindra Walkins In Pune
- View All Walkins
- Assessments
POPULAR COURSES
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Adobe Flex Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Adv Java Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Agile Testing Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Ajax Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Android Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Apex Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Asp.net Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Blackberry Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Bootstrap Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>C Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>C++ Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>CakePHP Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>COBOL Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Codeigniter Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Core Java Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Css3 Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Data Mining Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Drupal Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>ERP Tools Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Hadoop Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Html Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Ibm - As/400 Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>IBM Cognos Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>IOS Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>J Query Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Java Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Java Script Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>JBOSS Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>JDBC Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>JMeter Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Joomla Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Linux Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>LoadRunner Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Maven Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>MS Azure Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Mysql Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Networking Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Node.js Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>OBIEE Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>OLAP Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Oracle Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>PHP Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Python Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Qlik View Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>QTP Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>ReactJS Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Sap BI Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Sap Hr Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Scrum Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Scala Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Selenium Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>T-SQL Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Teradata Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Testing Tools Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>VSAM Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>WiMAX Tutorial
Management Skills
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Advertising Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Artificial Intelligence Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Business Analyst Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Business Environment Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Consumer Behaviour Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions '>Critical Thinking Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Customer Relationship Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>E-commerce Concepts Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Food Resources Manual Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Forex Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Global Money Markets Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Statistics Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Hotel Front Office Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Industrial Relations Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>ITIL Configuration Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Management Hotel Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Managerial Economics Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Marketing Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Marketing Research Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Organisational Behaviour Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Payroll Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Patent Law Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Principles Of Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Principles Of Service Marketing Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Project Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Production And Operations Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Quantitative Techniques Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Quality Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Research Methodology Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Sales Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Strategic Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Working Capital Management Tutorial
Communication Skills
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Business Communications Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions '>Principles Of Communication Tutorial
Business Skills
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Business Ethics Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Change Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Marketing Strategy Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions '>Sales Forecasting Tutorial
Digital Marketing Skills
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Digital Marketing Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions '>Mobile Marketing Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Pay Per Click (ppc) Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions '>Social Media Marketing Tutorial
Human Resources Skills
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Hr Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Training And Development Tutorial
Health Care Skills
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Medical Terminology(adaptive*) Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Pharmacology Tutorial
Finance Skills
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Accounts And Finance For Managers Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Business Management For Financial Advisers Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '> Financial Management Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Financial Reporting And Analysis Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Financial Services Marketing Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Modern Banking Tutorial
- Tutorial Interview Questions Practice Test '>Tally Tutorial
All Courses
All Practice Tests
Resume Writing Tips
- Tips to revamp your tech resume
- 7 Step guide to post your resume online
- Challenge of Resume Preparation for Freshers
- Tips for formatting your resume
- Have a Short and Attention Grabbing Resume
- Do you have employment gaps in your resume?
- Making a great Resume: Get the basics right
- Resume Tips, Resume Advice
- How to get right job with right resume?
- How to design your resume?
- Have you ever lie on your resume? Read This
- Tips for writing resume in slowdown
- What do employers look for in a resume?
- 21 Resume tips for a killer resume
- Resume tips for techies
Interview Tips
- 5 ways to be authentic in an interview
- Tips to help you face your job interview
- Top 10 commonly asked BPO Interview questions
- 5 things you should never talk in any job interview
- 2018 Best job interview tips for job seekers
- 7 Tips to recruit the right candidates in 2018
- 5 Important interview questions techies fumble most
- What are avoidable questions in an Interview?
- Top 4 tips to help you get hired as a receptionist
- 8 things ever to say in a job interview
- 5 Tips to Overcome Fumble During an Interview
- How to Overcome Pre-interview Jitters
- What Not to Do in a Job Interview?
- 8 Mock Interview Questions for Freshers
- How to face Telephone Interview?
Career Tips
- The impact of GST on job creation
- How Can Freshers Keep Their Job Search Going?
- How to Convert Your Internship into a Full Time Job?
- 5 Top Career Tips to Get Ready for a Virtual Job Fair
- Smart tips to succeed in virtual job fairs
- Why Email Marketing?
- Top 10 facts why you need a cover letter?
- 6 things to remember for Eid celebrations
- 9 ways to get succeed in job search
- 5 ways to turn your internship in a job
- 7 job search tips during Ramadan
- Top 5 GCC jobs of the future
- Most popular women in Tech History
- Blind Hiring: 2018 Recruitment trend
- 3 Golden rules to optimize your job search
- Union Budget 2018 Highlights
- Online hiring saw 14% rise in November: Report
- Hiring Activities Saw Growth in March: Report
- Attrition rate dips in corporate India: Survey
- 2016 Most Productive year for Staffing: Study
- The impact of Demonetization across sectors
- Most important skills required to get hired
- How startups are innovating with interview formats
- Does chemistry workout in job interviews?
- 15 signs your job interview is going horribly
- Overview of IT/ITes sector
- Time to Expand NBFCs: Rise in Demand for Talent
- Here's how to train middle managers
- This is how banks are wooing startups
- Nokia to cut thousands of jobs
- Our Portals :
- Canada Jobs
- South Africa Jobs
- Malaysia Jobs
- Singapore Jobs
- Australia Jobs
- New Zealand Jobs
Wisdomjobs.com is one of the best job search sites in India.
- 3,24,69,003 Resumes Uploaded
- 16,70,393 Jobs Available
- 1,32,30,521 Assessments taken
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life context. It is an
A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life
A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods, but quantitative methods are sometimes also used. Case studies are good
The case study method often involves simply observing what happens to or reconstructing 'the case history' of a single participant or group of individuals (such
Case study method is the most widely used method in academia for researchers interested in qualitative research (Baskarada, 2014). Research
"A case study is an empirical inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context, especially when the boundaries
Although case study methods remain a controversial approach to data collection, they are widely recognised in many social science studies especially when
Abstract. Qualitative case study methodology enables researchers to conduct an in-depth exploration of intricate phenomena within some specific
Case study method has the strengths and weaknesses of both forms of inquiry. Weaknesses. Case studies involve analysis of small data sets, such as one or two
Meaning: The case study method is a very popular form of qualitative analysis and involves a careful and complete observation of a social unit